Saturday, December 30, 2017

Morosini & Sanchez Badin: Reconceptualizing International Investment Law from the Global South

Fabio Morosini (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul - Law) & Michelle Ratton Sanchez Badin (Fundacao Getulio Vargas - Law) have published Reconceptualizing International Investment Law from the Global South (Cambridge Univ. Press 2017). Contents include:
  • Michelle Ratton Sanchez Badin & Fabio Morosini, Reconceptualizing international investment law from the global South
  • Vivienne Bath, The South and alternative models of trade and investment regulation – Chinese investment and approaches to international investment agreements
  • Rodrigo Polanco Lazo, The Chilean experience in South-South investment and trade agreements
  • Vivienne Bath, Australia and the Asia-Pacific: the regulation of investment flows into Australia and the role of free trade agreements
  • James Nedumpara, India's trade and investment agreements: striking a balance between investor protection rights and development concerns
  • Michelle Ratton Sanchez Badin & Fabio Morosini, Navigating between resistance and conformity with the international investment regime: the Brazilian agreements on cooperation and facilitation of investments (ACFIs)
  • Malebakeng Agnes Forere, The New South African protection of investment act: striking a balance between attraction of FDI and redressing the Apartheid Legacies
  • Andrew Lang & Nicolás Marcelo Perrone, Experimenting with international investment law: initiatives from the Global South

New Issue: Journal of International Criminal Justice

The latest issue of the Journal of International Criminal Justice (Vol. 15, no. 5, December 2017) is out. Contents include:
  • In Memoriam
    • In Memoriam: M. Cherif Bassiouni,1937–2017
  • Articles
    • Yvonne McDermott, The International Criminal Court’s Chambers Practice Manual: Towards a Return to Judicial Law Making in International Criminal Procedure?
    • Rosemary Grey, The ICC’s First ‘Forced Pregnancy’ Case in Historical Perspective
    • Emily Haslam & Rod Edmunds, Whose Number is it Anyway?: Common Legal Representation, Consultations and the ‘Statistical Victim’
    • Olga Kavran, International Criminal Courts and the Right to Information
  • Cases Before International Courts and Tribunals
    • Alexander Heinze, The Kosovo Specialist Chambers’ Rules of Procedure and Evidence: A Diamond Made Under Pressure?
  • National Prosecution of International Crimes: Legislation and Cases
    • Hector Olasolo & Joel M F Ramirez Mendoza, The Colombian Integrated System of Truth, Justice, Reparation and Non-Repetition

New Issue: Revista Iberoamericana de Derecho Internacional y de la Integración

The latest issue of the Revista Iberoamericana de Derecho Internacional y de la Integración (no. 7, December 2017) is out. The table of contents is here.

Friday, December 29, 2017

New Issue: International Legal Materials

The latest issue of International Legal Materials (Vol. 56, no. 6, December 2017) is out. Contents include:
  • Prosecutor v. Al-Bashir: Decision Under Article 87(7) of the Rome Statute on the Non-Compliance by South Africa with the Request by the Court for the Arrest and Surrender of Omar Al-Bashir (Int'l Crim. Ct.), with introductory note by Max du Plessis
  • Zongo v. Burkina Faso, Judgment & Judgment on Reparations (Afr. Ct. H.P.R.), with introductory note by Oliver Windridge
  • United Nations Security Council Resolutions 2199 & 2253, with introductory note by Jimmy Gurulé
  • United Nations Security Council Resolutions 2321, 2371, & 2375, with introductory note by Meredith Rathbone and Pete Jeydel
  • Presidential Policy Guidance: Procedures for Approving Direct Action Against Terrorist Targets Located Outside The United States and Areas of Active Hostilities, with introductory note by Rita Siemion

Thursday, December 28, 2017

New Issue: Asian International Arbitration Journal

The latest issue of the Asian International Arbitration Journal (Vol. 13, no. 1, 2017) is out. Contents include:
  • Kenneth Beale & Nelson Goh, Due Process Challenges in Asia: An Emerging High Bar
  • João Ribeiro & Shunsuke Sato, Transparency in Investment Arbitration: Its Importance for Japan
  • Ikram Ullah, Judicial Review of Arbitral Award in Pakistan
  • Luxi Gan & Shudong Yang, Issues in the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in China
  • Varun Mansinghka, Third-Party Funding in International Commercial Arbitration and its Impact on Independence of Arbitrators: An Indian Perspective

Mälksoo & Benedek: Russia and the European Court of Human Rights: The Strasbourg Effect

Lauri Mälksoo (Univ. of Tartu - Law) & Wolfgang Benedek (Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz - Institute of International Law and International Relations & European Training and Research Centre for Human Rights and Democracy) have published Russia and the European Court of Human Rights: The Strasbourg Effect (Cambridge Univ. Press 2017). Contents include:
  • Lauri Mälksoo, Introduction: Russia, Strasbourg and the paradox of a human rights backlash
  • Petra Roter, Russia in the Council of Europe: participation a la carte
  • Anton Burkov, The use of European human rights law in Russian courts
  • Sergei Marochkin, ECtHR and the Russian Constitutional Court: duet or duel?
  • Alexei Trochev, The Russian Constitutional Court and the Strasbourg court: judicial pragmatism in a dual state
  • Mikhail Antonov, Philosophy behind human rights: Valery Zorkin vs the West
  • Bill Bowring, Russia's cases in the ECtHR and the question of socialization
  • Elisabet Fura & Rait Maruste, Russia's impact on the Strasbourg system: as seen by two former judges of the European Court of Human Rights
  • Philip Leach, Egregious human rights violations in Chechnya: the continuing pursuit of justice
  • Vladislav Starzhenetskiy, Property rights in Russia: reconsidering the socialist legal tradition
  • Dmitri Bartenev, LGBT rights in Russia and European human rights standards
  • Benedikt Harzl, Nativist ideological responses to European/liberal human rights discourses in contemporary Russia
  • Wolfgang Benedek, General conclusions

Wednesday, December 27, 2017

Gill, Fleck, Boothby, & Vanheusden: Leuven Manual on the International Law Applicable to Peace Operations

Terry Gill (Univ. of Amsterdam - Law), Dieter Fleck (formerly, Ministry of Defense, Germany), William H. Boothby (formerly, Royal Air Force Legal Services), & Alfons Vanheusden (Ministry of Defense, Belgium) have published Leuven Manual on the International Law Applicable to Peace Operations (Cambridge Univ. Press 2017). Here's the abstract:
The Leuven Manual is the authoritative, comprehensive overview of the rules that are to be followed in peace operations conducted by the United Nations, the European Union, NATO, the African Union and other organisations, with detailed commentary on best practice in relation to those rules. Topics covered include human rights, humanitarian law, gender aspects, the use of force and detention by peacekeepers, the protection of civilians, and the relevance of the laws of the host State. The international group of expert authors includes leading academics, together with military officers and policy officials with practical experience in contemporary peace operations, supported in an individual capacity by input from experts working for the UN, the African Union, NATO, and the International Committee of the Red Cross. This volume is intended to be of assistance to states and international organisations involved in the planning and conduct of peace operations, and practitioners and academia.

Cameron: The Privatization of Peacekeeping: Exploring Limits and Responsibility under International Law

Lindsey Cameron (International Committee of the Red Cross) has published The Privatization of Peacekeeping: Exploring Limits and Responsibility under International Law (Cambridge Univ. Press 2017). Here's the abstract:
Private military and security companies (PMSCs) have been used in every peace operation since 1990, and reliance on them is increasing at a time when peace operations themselves are becoming ever more complex. This book provides an essential foundation for the emerging debate on the use of PMSCs in this context. It clarifies key issues such as whether their use complies with the principles of peacekeeping, outlines the implications of the status of private contractors as non-combatants under international humanitarian law, and identifies potential problems in holding states and international organizations responsible for their unlawful acts. Written as a clarion call for greater transparency, this book aims to inform the discussion to ensure that international lawyers and policy makers ask the right questions and take the necessary steps so that states and international organizations respect the law when endeavouring to keep peace in an increasingly privatized world.

Tuesday, December 26, 2017

New Issue: Manchester Journal of International Economic Law

The latest issue of the Manchester Journal of International Economic Law (Vol. 14, no. 3, 2017) is out. Contents include:
  • Aniruddha Rajput, Safeguarding India's Regulatory Autonomy: Objectives, Process and Possible Outcomes
  • David Collins, The UK Should Include ISDS in its Post-Brexit International Investment Agreements
  • Noam Zamir, The Police Powers Doctrine in International Investment Law
  • Oscar C.H. Yang, Continuing Anti-Dumping Investigations despite De Minimis Dumping Margins: The Case of Canada - Welded Pipe
  • Marina Fyrigou-Koulouri, Sovereign Debt Restructuring: Is There a Place for International Investment Arbitration?

Symposium: The Psychology of International Law

On January 9-10, 2018, the European Society of International Law, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and the University of St. Gallen will hold a symposium on "The Psychology of International Law," in Jerusalem. The program is here.

Methymaki & Tzanakopoulos: Freedom With Their Exception: Jurisdiction and Immunity as Rule and Exception

Eleni Methymaki (Univ. of Glasgow - Law) & Antonios Tzanakopoulos (Univ. of Oxford - Law) have posted Freedom With Their Exception: Jurisdiction and Immunity as Rule and Exception (in Exceptions and Defences in International Law, Federica Paddeu & Lorand Bartels eds, forthcoming). Here's the abstract:
The relationship between the rules on state jurisdiction and sovereign immunity, as well as the rules of sovereign immunity between themselves, has been the subject of long-standing debate among international lawyers, as well as international and domestic courts. Although the starting point of any discussion is the jurisdiction of the territorial state, it is also accepted that domestic courts are barred from exercising such jurisdiction over acts of another sovereign. This latter rule has its own exceptions, namely that a foreign state is not entitled to immunity for acts performed in a commercial capacity and certain other limited circumstances. What are the consequences of such a rule-exception-exception to the exception relationship, and do they affect the waiver of immunity, the burden of proof, or the interpretation of these norms? This chapter argues that the relationship between jurisdiction and immunity as rule and exception has, in the final analysis, no particular normative weight in their application and interpretation by courts and other law-applying actors.

Christensen: The Social Structure of Transnational Criminal Justice: A Cluster of Spaces Beyond National Borders

Mikkel Jarle Christensen (Univ. of Copenhagen - Law) has posted The Social Structure of Transnational Criminal Justice: A Cluster of Spaces Beyond National Borders (in New Perspectives on the Structure of Transnational Criminal Justice, Mikkel Jarle Christensen & Neil Boister eds., forthcoming). Here's the abstract:
This article analyses elements of the social structure of transnational criminal justice. The main goal of the analysis is to investigate, if the terminology crafted around transnational criminal law as a distinct legal system corresponds to the social structuration of this space as it can be observed in the justice practices that drive it. To enable such an analysis, the article contributes both a theoretical discussion of how best to conceptualise the social spaces of transnational criminal justice as well as, more cautiously, an empirical investigation into the workings of these spaces, focusing the fight against drugs, terrorism, corruption and ecological crimes. Building conceptually on Pierre Bourdieu’s field theory, the analytical focal point of the article is the practices of transnational criminal justice and the professionals who are active in this space. This raises crucial questions of how the social practices of transnational criminal justice structures usages and developments of the law. Based on the identification and analysis of four separate but interrelated spaces of practice, the article argues that our theoretical understanding of transnational criminal justice and law needs to be recalibrated to take into account the different ways in which it is mobilised to create either security or good governance.

Monday, December 25, 2017

New Issue: Journal of East Asia and International Law

The latest issue of the Journal of East Asia and International Law (Vol. 10, no. 2, Autumn 2017) is out. Contents include:
  • Issue Focus: Legal Aspects of Renewable Energy Development
    • Weidong Yang, Problems and Adjustments of Renewable Energy Legislation in China
    • Kenji Asano, Enactment and Enforcing Processes of the Japanese Feed in Tariff Law: Difficulties for Maximizing Renewable's Diffusion while Minimizing National Burden
  • Articles
    • Gary Lilienthal & Nehaluddin Ahmad, Communis Opinio and Jus Cogens: A Critical Review on Pro-Torture Law and Policy Argument
    • Yong Wang, China's Practice in Treaty Reservations since 1949: A Critical Review
  • Notes & Comments
    • Lin Zhang & Lingsheng Zhang, Research and Teaching of International Law in Contemporary China: A Landscape Sketch
    • Eric Yong Joong Lee, Will Trump's Military Option against North Korea Work? Legal and Political Restraints
  • Regional Focus & Controversies: International Law and Natural Phenomenon
    • Natalia Y. Puspita, Natural Disaster in Armed Conflict Area: The Implementation of the Doctrine of Responsibility to Protect in the ASEAN
    • Hao Shen, International Deep Seabed Mining and China's Legislative Commitment to Marine Environmental Protection
  • East Asian Observer
    • Sunjoo Kang & Younjoo Kim & Insook Kim, Refugee's Rights to HIV/AIDS Healthcare in Korea under the UNAIDS Guidelines
    • N. Kala & Y. Abaydeldinov & T. Furman & A. Ponomarev, The World Tourism Organization for Countering Terrorist Threats

Sunday, December 24, 2017

New Issue: Diritti umani e diritto internazionale

The latest issue of Diritti umani e diritto internazionale (Vol. 11, no. 3, 2017) is out. Contents include:
  • Studi
    • Pasquale De Sena, Dignità umana in senso oggettivo e diritto internazionale
    • Concetta Maria Pontecorvo, La gestione internazionale delle emergenze sanitarie globali alla luce del caso Ebola: quid novi?
  • Interventi
    • Silvia Favalli, La Convenzione ONU sui diritti delle persone con disabilità nella giurisprudenza di Strasburgo: considerazioni a margine della sentenza Guberina c. Croazia
    • Giustizia transizionale: ruolo delle vittime e ammissibilità di misure di amnistia o di riduzione delle sanzioni in caso di gravi violazioni dei diritti umani
    • Elena Carpanelli, Transitional Justice in Colombia: Shadows and Lights of the Agreement on Victims of the Conflict
    • Gabriella Citroni, Rodríguez-Bronchú Carceller, Transitional Justice in Nepal: From Promise of Redress to New Tool for Exclusion?
    • Annalisa Zamburlini, El Salvador, dai massacri alla ricerca di giustizia: il ruolo della società civile
  • Osservatorio
    • Marina Castellaneta, La Corte europea dei diritti umani e l’applicazione del principio dell’abuso del diritto nei casi di hate speech
    • Ludovica Poli, Infondatezza manifesta… ma solo per alcuni: riflessioni a margine del caso Charlie Gard
    • Alberto Miglio, La condizionalità di fronte alla Corte di giustizia

Saturday, December 23, 2017

Lamp: Legislative Innovation in the Trade and Climate Regimes

Nicolas Lamp (Queen's Univ. - Law) has posted Legislative Innovation in the Trade and Climate Regimes: Towards a Framework for the Comparative Analysis of Multilateral Lawmaking. Here's the abstract:
The conclusion of the Trade Facilitation Agreement in 2013 and the Paris Agreement in 2015 represent significant breakthroughs for the multilateral trade and climate regimes, respectively. The chapter explores the innovations in lawmaking principles and techniques that made the conclusion of these agreements possible. To this end, the chapter develops a framework for the comparative analysis of multilateral lawmaking along five dimensions: the principles pursuant to which the participants in lawmaking assume commitments, the techniques that the participants employ to generate legal obligations, the modalities that they use to establish the form and scope of each individual participant’s commitments, the legal form of these commitments, and their potential effects. The chapter discusses the recent experience of the trade and climate regimes to shed light on the benefits and drawbacks of competing approaches to multilateral lawmaking along each of these dimensions.

New Issue: Journal of International Organizations Studies

The latest issue of the Journal of International Organizations Studies (Vol. 8, no. 2, Fall 2017) is out. Contents include:
  • John Mathiason, The United Nations at the Country Level: Reassessing Operational Activities for Development
  • Patrick J. Tiefenbacher, The “Amazon Moment”—A New Business Model for the United Nations at the Country Level
  • Annett Richter, The Norm Life Cycle of UN Reform: “Delivering as One and UN System-Wide Coherence”
  • Luciana Campos, The “Delivering as One” UN Initiative: Reforming the United Nations System at the Country Level

New Issue: Journal of Conflict & Security Law

The latest issue of the Journal of Conflict & Security Law (Vol. 22, no. 3, Winter 2017) is out. Contents include:
  • Ray Murphy, The United Nations Mission in South Sudan and the Protection of Civilians
  • Harry Aitken, The Security Council and International Law Enforcement: A Kelsenian Perspective on Civilian Protection Peacekeeping Mandates
  • Shavana Musa, The Saudi-Led Coalition in Yemen, Arms Exports and Human Rights: Prevention Is Better Than Cure
  • Catherine Connolly, ‘Necessity Knows no Law’: The Resurrection of Kriegsraison through the US Targeted Killing Programme
  • Lenneke Sprik, Command Responsibility in Peacekeeping Missions: Normative Obligations of Protection in a Criminal Law Environment
  • Clive Walker, The War of Words with Terrorism: An Assessment of Three Approaches to Pursue and Prevent

Engle: Feminist Governance and International Law: From Liberal to Carceral Feminism

Karen Engle (Univ. of Texas, Austin - Law) has posted Feminist Governance and International Law: From Liberal to Carceral Feminism (in Governance Feminism: Notes from the Field, Janet Halley, Prabha Kotiswaran, Rachel Rebouché & Hila Shamir eds., forthcoming). Here's the abstract:

Feminist legal theory came to international law and discourse later than it came to many other legal fields. It primarily emerged in international human rights where, in a surprisingly short amount of time, it went from being extremely marginal to relatively mainstream. Not unrelatedly, it has primarily grown, and also developed significant influence, in the doctrinal areas of international humanitarian and criminal law. This piece, written as a chapter in a book on governance feminism, chronicles the trajectory of feminist engagement with international law, paying special attention to how both feminisms and feminists have played governing roles in its development and operation.

The chapter provides an account of three distinctive feminist approaches to women’s human rights that developed from the mid-1980s through the mid-1990s. Each of the three approaches is identified according to its distinctive concern: liberal inclusion, structural bias, and the Third World, respectively. During the early period of feminist engagement, these approaches variously competed, complemented, and exchanged with each other in the push for a feminist foothold in human rights law. But the end of the Cold War, a compromise around “culturally sensitive universalism,” the emergence of a preoccupation with sexual violence in conflict, and the pursuit of criminal law as the primary response to it all ultimately functioned to favor a strand of structural bias feminism focused on female sexual subordination and to suppress and sideline the other feminist critiques, especially their material dimensions.

Tracing this genealogy, the chapter calls into question a dangerous common sense about sexual violence in conflict, a common sense that bears upon culture, sex, economic distribution, and criminalization, and that still dominates human rights law and discourse today. It seeks to motivate a return to, and reevaluation of, other possibilities of feminist critique that were left by the wayside when the structural bias critique prevailed, and when sexual violence and carceral responses became central to feminist approaches to human rights law.

Friday, December 22, 2017

Chechi & Renold: Cultural Heritage Law and Ethics: Mapping Recent Developments

Alessandro Chechi (Univ. of Geneva - Art-Law Centre) & Marc-André Renold (Univ. of Geneva - Art-Law Centre) have published Cultural Heritage Law and Ethics: Mapping Recent Developments (Schulthess 2017). Contents include:
  • Lucas Lixinski & Vassilis Tzevelekos, The Strained, Elusive and Wide-Ranging Relationship between International Cultural Heritage Law and the Law of State Responsibility: From Collective Enforcement to Concurrent Responsibility
  • Wenke Brückner, “Cultural Genocide” and the International Criminal Court. The Possibilities and Limits of the Protection of Cultural Heritage
  • Sabine von Schorlemer, The Usefulness of the “Responsibility To Protect” as Applied to the Protection of Cultural Heritage in Armed Conflict
  • Gareth Fletcher, “Scores on the Doors”: Establishing a Certificate of Virtue Framework for Future Art Market Regulation
  • Sophie Vigneron, Codes of Conduct and the Regulation of the Art Trade in England: Between Hard and Soft Law

Burri: International Law and Artificial Intelligence

Thomas Burri (Univ. of St. Gallen - Law) has posted International Law and Artificial Intelligence (German Yearbook of International Law, forthcoming). Here's the abstract:
This paper proposes five arguments about major aspects of artificial intelligence and their implications for international law. The aspects are: automation, personhood, weapons systems, control, and standardization.

New Additions to the UN Audiovisual Library of International Law

The Codification Division of the UN Office of Legal Affairs recently added new lectures to the UN Audiovisual Library of International Law. They were given by Claudia Martin on “The Role and Jurisdiction of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights” and Diego Rodríguez-Pinzón on “The Inter-American Human Rights System: The Inter-American Commission” and “Sistema Interamericano de Derechos Humanos: La Comisión Interamericana.”

Thursday, December 21, 2017

AJIL Unbound Symposium: Global Animal Law, Part II: The Case for Global Legal Animal Studies

AJIL Unbound has posted a symposium on "Global Animal Law, Part II: The Case for Global Legal Animal Studies." (Part I is here.) The symposium includes an introduction by Anne Peters and contributions by Kristen Stilt, Stefan Kirchner, Jiwen Chang, Radha Ivory, and Charlotte Blattner.

Call for Papers: The Local in the Universal: Social, Women’s, Labour and Radical Histories of International Law

The European Society of International Law's Interest Group on the History of International Law has issued a call for papers for an Agora proposal to be submitted for consideration for the 2018 ESIL Annual Conference. The proposal's theme is: "The Local in the Universal: Social, Women’s, Labour and Radical Histories of International Law." Here's the call:

The Local in the Universal: Social, Women’s, Labour and Radical Histories of International Law

The Interest Group on the History of International Law seeks abstracts for an Agora Proposal to be submitted to the European Society of International Law for its 2018 Conference on ‘International Law and Universality’ to be held 13–15 September 2018 in Manchester.

Theme

Universality’s flip side is the local and the particular. Locations are inescapable parts of any idea of universality. People are positioned in time, place, class, gender, race, ethnicity, indigeneity, and sexuality. These particulars formed familiar coordinates for locating different peoples within ideas of the universal; at the bottom of hierarchies — subsumed, excluded, ignored, erased.

The beginning of international legal history’s recent renaissance lay in exploring one assertion of universality — the liberal-democratic progressive narrative — and Europe as its location, and white male jurists as its particular. Later advances began to unpack the imperial, racial and class aspects of international law’s pasts, to understand how that universal spread to many localities. Some of the most recent and exciting historical projects have begun to draw our attention to the everyday, to materiality, objects, and archives beyond the legal, to tell personal, hidden and revealing histories of international law.

And yet, international legal history has so far been largely resistant to more radical forms of history that spurred so many of the main innovations in twentieth century historiography: social histories, women’s histories, labour histories, and histories of resistance and radicalism. Other themes at the 2018 ESIL Conference invite papers on universality and particularism’s histories at the juridical, conceptual and theoretical levels. This Agora seeks to expand that universe in the direction of something more local, personal and radical — to uncover histories that have been hidden within these longues durées and big trends.

Fitting with and interrogating the theme of universality, we seek papers that look for the local in the universal and the legal, from across the globe and from any period of historical inquiry. We are looking to share the hidden stories, archival gems, and accounts of everyday lives and movements that illuminate and contest the universal in new and powerful ways. It is particularly fitting that we do this in Manchester, a city that was one major birthplace of the industrial revolution, the labour movement, and the suffragette movement.

Issues arising within this theme might include, but are not limited to:
  • The role of women and women’s movements in constructing, challenging and critiquing the ideas of universality in international law.
  • Labour and international law: competing universals of solidarity and capitalism.
  • Race, ethnicity, indigeneity, intersectionality and the stories of challenging, rethinking and repurposing the universal.
  • Rebellions, radicalism and resistance: histories of popular debate, protests and discord over universality in law.
  • Shifting the ‘turn to biography’ in international legal histories: introducing the field to new lives and new, untold stories.
  • The significance of rural areas, cities, communities, migration and labour flows for rethinking law, the international, and the universal.
Instructions
  • Submit an abstract of no more than 800 words, submitted by email to esilighil@gmail.com by 17 January 2018. No late submissions will be considered.
  • An interest group subcommittee will then blind review the abstracts and finalise the proposed format. The likely format will be a panel of 4 papers, but this may change depending on abstracts received.
  • Selected abstracts will be sent, with the Agora theme, to the ESIL 2018 Conference organisers for their consideration by 31 January 2018. If the proposal is successful, full papers (minimum 3000 words) will need to be submitted by 15 July 2018 for circulation to other Agora participants.
  • We encourage proposals from scholars in any discipline — legal or not — and at any stage of career. Selection will be based on scholarly merit and with regard to producing an engaging workshop, without prejudice to gender, seniority, language or geographical location
  • Please circulate this call to anyone you think may be interested.
  • Please direct any questions to Martin Clark (m.clark1@lse.ac.uk) or Markus Beham (markus.beham@uni-passau.de).

New Issue: International Relations

The latest issue of International Relations (Vol. 31, no. 4, December 2017) is out. Contents include:
  • Michael Byers, Crises and international cooperation: an Arctic case study
  • Brian Christopher Rathbun, Subvert the dominant paradigm: a critical analysis of rationalism’s status as a paradigm of International Relations
  • Benjamin R Banta, Leveraging the idea of ‘Humanitarian War’
  • Arash Heydarian Pashakhanlou, Fully integrated content analysis in International Relations
  • Ali Balci, Writing the world into counter-hegemony: identity, power, and ‘foreign policy’ in ethnic movements
  • Seo-Hyun Park, Rhetorical entrapment and the politics of alliance cooperation: explaining divergent outcomes in Japan and South Korea during the Iraq War
  • James Turner Johnson, Three perspectives on just war

Tams: Ways Out of the Marshland: Investment Lawyers and the Law of State Succession

Christian J. Tams (Univ. of Glasgow - Law) has posted Ways Out of the Marshland: Investment Lawyers and the Law of State Succession (in Investment Arbitration as a Motor of General International Law, Ranier Hofmann, Stephan Schill, & Christian Tams eds., forthcoming). Here's the abstract:
This is the manuscript of a paper given at the Frankfurt Investment Law Workshop 2016, which discusses the interrelationship between the general rules governing State succession on the one hand, and the particular approach to state succession adopted by investment lawyers. The paper proceeds from recent, high-profile cases such as SANUM or WORLD WIDE MINERALS and situates these in an analytical framework.