Sunday, April 5, 2026
Chat with the Author: Yilin Wang on “Locating TWAIL Scholarship in China”
New Issue: Polish Review of International and European Law
- Articles
- Marija Dordeska, What Principles in What Proceedings? The Use and Development of General Principles of Law in the ICJ’s Advisory vs Contentious Jurisprudence
- Szymon Zaręba, The Evolution of the International Court of Justice’s Approach to the Right of Actio Popularis Before It, Based on Recent Case Law
- Aghil Mohammadi & Aref Laridashti, The Forcible Transfer of Ukrainian Children as Genocide: An Assessment of Russia's Actions in Light of the International Documents and Judicial Rulings
- Tomasz Mirosławski, Workplace Monitoring in Europe: A Review of Regulatory Perspectives and Developments
- Case Comments
- Tomasz Kamiński & Paweł Natorski, Comments on the ICJ Judgment on Delimitation of the Continental Shelf between Nicaragua and Colombia beyond 200 Nautical Miles from the Nicaraguan Coast (Nicaragua v. Colombia) (13 July 2023)
- Julia Kapelańska-Pręgowska, Comments on the ECtHR Judgment in Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and Others v. Switzerland (9 April 2024)
Thursday, April 2, 2026
New Issue: Nordic Journal of International Law
The latest issue of the Nordic Journal of International Law (Vol. 94, no. 4, 2025) is out. Contents include:- Special Issue: International Organizations and the Private Sector
- Jan Klabbers, Legal Aspects of the Relations Between International Organizations and the Private Sector: Editor’s Introduction
- Lorenzo Gasbarri, The Participation of Private Stakeholders in International Tourism Governance
- Scarlett McArdle, Private Sector Engagement in Global Health: WHO and WHO-Foundation
- Sebastián Machado, Divide and Conquer: The Fragmentation of the European Space Institutionalism
- Paulina Rundel, The ILC’s Work on Dispute Settlement Between International Organizations and Private Parties
- Bianca Isabella Ortiz, Dispute Settlement Between International Organizations and Private Parties Through International Arbitration: Observations from the Practice of the United Nations System
- Martina Coxová, Beyond Staff: Expanding the Jurisdiction of International Administrative Tribunals for Enhanced Accountability and Due Process
Wednesday, April 1, 2026
ESIL IG Online Workshops in Connection with Research Forum 2026
- IG on International Economic Law - April 7 - Sustainability of Global Economic Governance
- IG on History of International Law - April 7 - What could be the future of a sustainable international law? Lessons from history
- IG on International Legal Theory and Philosophy - April 8 - Normalizing Sustainability. Theoretical Perspectives on Stability and Change in International Law
- IG on International Business and Human Rights - April 7 - Sustainability, Business & Human Rights: Evolutions from Soft to Hard Law
- IG on the Law of the Sea - April 8 - To be or not to be: The sustainability of international law of the sea and the international law of sustainable seas
Tuesday, March 31, 2026
Call for Papers: ESIL Interest Groups Workshops Preceding 2026 ESIL Conference (Updated)
- IG on Critical Approaches to International Law: Conflict and International Law: Beyond the Promise of Peace (deadline: 1 April 2026)
- IG on International Criminal Justice: Is the International Criminal Court in Conflict? (deadline: 7 April 2026)
- IG on International Economic Law: International Economic Law and Conflict (deadline: 10 April 2026)
- IG on International Organisations: Conflict Unbound? Revisiting International Organizations and Contestation (deadline: 10 April 2026)
- IG on Migration and Refugee Law: Asylum in Times of Conflict: Unsettling the Boundaries of Refugee Protection (deadline: 10 April 2026)
- IG on International Law of Culture: The International Law of Culture at a Crossroads: Past Developments and Future Directions (deadline: 10 April 2026)
- IG on Social Sciences and International Law: Contestation in international law (deadline: 10 April 2026)
- IG on International Business and Human Rights: Business and Human Rights at the Fault Lines of Armed Conflicts (deadline: 12 April 2026)
- IG on the EU as a Global Actor: The EU as Global Peace Actor: Rhetoric or Reality? (deadline: 15 April 2026)
- IG on International Legal Theory and Philoosophy: A World without Rules? The Responsibility of International Law Scholars in Times of Fatigue (deadline: 15 April 2026)
- IG on Feminism and International Law: Gender and Conflict in International Law (deadline: 20 April 2026)
- IG on International Human Rights Law: The role of conflict in the making and shaping of International Human Rights Law (deadline: 20 April 2026)
- IG on International Health Law: Health Protection and Armed Conflicts in a Fragmented Legal Landscape: Emergencies, Security, and Governance (deadline: 24 April 2026)
- IG on Energy and International Law: From Interdependence to Weaponisation: Energy Security and International Law (deadline: 24 April 2026)
- IG on Peace and Security: Peace and Security beyond the UN Charter: Appraising Alternative Models of Global Security Governance and Law (deadline: 28 April 2026)
Wade: Preferential Rules of Origin in the Law of the WTO and PTAs: The Challenge of 3D Printing
Where does a 3D printed good come from? This book examines preferential rules of origin within the context of advanced manufacturing, focusing on 3D printing. From a foundation in the legal and technical aspects of rules of origin, it explores why 3D printing implies reconsidering how materials, labour, and technology factor into the determination of the origin of a good and the risks and opportunities this brings to producers and traders. The book suggests revisiting rules of origin in PTAs and encourages the WTO to promote incorporating rules or origin and new production methods into a balanced trade framework that supports producers, traders, and consumers globally.
Monday, March 30, 2026
Carnegie & Clark: Global Governance Under Fire: How International Organizations Resist the Populist Wave
Populist leaders around the world increasingly reject international organizations, decrying them as constraints on state power and rallying followers against the “global elite” who run them. These institutions—painstakingly built through decades of negotiation and multilateral cooperation—are often seen as passive bystanders, unable or unwilling to push back. In Global Governance Under Fire, Allison Carnegie and Richard Clark challenge this view, arguing that international organizations are, in fact, strategic agents with the tools to resist populist pressures. Offering fresh theoretical insights and original empirical analysis, they investigate how these institutions fight back and how their defensive strategies are reshaping global governance.
Using a multimethod approach that draws on novel data and qualitative evidence, Carnegie and Clark identify four key strategies that international organizations employ both to appease and to sideline populists and their constituents. They find that while these strategies help fortify global governance against populist opposition, they may also produce unintended consequences, potentially eroding institutional legitimacy and fueling further resistance. A timely and compelling account, the book provides a crucial roadmap for understanding—and safeguarding—the global order.
Lecture: Lang on "Fantasies of No Value"
Sunday, March 29, 2026
Call for Papers: Absolute Rights under the ECHR at State Borders
Call for Submissions: Art and Turning Points in Law: A Twentieth-Century Intertwining?
Saturday, March 28, 2026
Conference: Teaching International Human Rights Law - in times of Normative Contestation
Friday, March 27, 2026
Lecture: Schabas on "A refresh of the Genocide Convention at the International Court of Justice?"
Thursday, March 26, 2026
Conference: Cambridge International Law Journal 15th Annual Conference
Webinar: Movies, TV Series and Teaching International Law
Call for Contributions: Oxford Reports on International Law (UN Treaty Body Case Law Reporters)
Wednesday, March 25, 2026
Call for Panel Proposals: International Law Weekend 2026
The American Branch of the International Law Association has issued a call for panel proposals for International Law Weekend 2026, which will take place in New York City on October 22-24. The theme is "[R]evolution in the International Legal Order." The call is here. The deadline is April 10, 2026.
AJIL Unbound Symposium: The Challenges and Prospects of Novel Types of Business and Human Rights Litigation
Tuesday, March 24, 2026
New Issue: La Comunità Internazionale
- Ottantesimo Anniversario Dell’entrata In Vigore Della Carta Dell’ONU (24 ottobre 1945-24 ottobre 2025)
- Pietro Gargiulo, L’ONU e il mantenimento della pace e della sicurezza internazionali: 80 anni di (diverse) ombre e (poche) luci
- Maria Rosaria Mauro, Le Nazioni Unite e la cooperazione economica e sociale: dalla cooperazione allo sviluppo alla promozione dello sviluppo sostenibile
- Laura Pineschi, 80 anni di tutela dei diritti umani nelle Nazioni Unite: un pilastro di vetro (in)frangibile?
- Cinquantesimo Anniversario Dell’adozione Dell’atto Finale Di Helsinki (1° agosto 1975-1° agosto 2025)
- Ivan Ingravallo, Il (mesto) cinquantesimo anniversario dell’Atto Finale di Helsinki
- Interventi
- Gabriella Arrigo & Maria Chiara Noto, Lo Spazio e il Piano Mattei per l’Africa
- Note e Commenti
- Alessia Preti, “It’s Genocide” – Remarks on the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory’s Latest Report
Call for Contributions: Arms Exports Unbound? The German Federal Constitutional Court’s Gaza Case in Perspective
Monday, March 23, 2026
Hilpold: Neutralität im Zeitalter des UN-Rechts: Unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Ukrainekonflikts
Der Ukraine-Konflikt hat viele Elemente des modernen Völkerrechts auf den Prüfstein gestellt. In diesem Zusammenhang ist auch die Frage wieder aktuell geworden, ob das völkerrechtliche Neutralitätsrecht noch mit dem modernen Völkerrecht in Einklang zu bringen ist.
In diesem Band beleuchten Experten und Expertinnen aus Österreich, der Schweiz, Deutschland und Italien diese Frage aus völkerrechtlicher, öffentlichrechtlicher, europarechtlicher und historischer Sicht. Sie kommen zu dem Ergebnis, dass im Friedensrecht der Vereinten Nationen eine Verpflichtung zur solidarischen Parteinahme zugunsten des Opfers einer Aggression besteht. Neutralität kann letztlich auch die Sicherheit der Neutralen gefährden.
Sunday, March 22, 2026
Lecture: Brunk on "War, Territory and International Law"
New Issue: International Organization
- Articles
- Sung Eun Kim & Krzysztof Pelc, Geography of Grievance: Industrial Hubs Magnify Political Discontent
- Christina Cottiero & Christina J. Schneider, International Financial Institutions and the Promotion of Autocratic Resilience
- Jamie Hintson & Kenneth A. Schultz, Closing Pandora’s Box: Can Shared Vulnerability Underpin Territorial Stability?
- Phillip Y. Lipscy & Jiajia Zhou, Institutional Racism in International Relations
- Research Notes
- Haillie Lee & Erik Voeten, Transboundary Air Pollution and Hazy Accountability: Evidence from South Korea
- Joshua A. Schwartz & Michael C. Horowitz, Delegating Destruction: Coercive Threats and Automated Nuclear Systems
- Calvert W. Jones, Authoritarian Reforms and External Legitimacy
Saturday, March 21, 2026
Jean: L'état de droit international : Voyage dans les méandres d'un concept juridique troublant
Depuis près d’une trentaine d’années, l’état de droit occupe une place centrale dans le discours international et s’est progressivement imposé comme un modèle de référence, un point de ralliement. Mais que signifie exactement ce concept ? S’agit-il d’une obligation juridique internationale, d’un principe général du droit, ou d’un simple idéal politique ? Quel est son statut et est-il compatible avec les structures actuelles de la société internationale ?
Cet ouvrage met en évidence le décalage profond entre les proclamations solennelles entourant l’état de droit et sa réalité juridique concrète. Il montre que cette notion est encore dépourvue de définition autonome, précise et partagée, se situant aujourd’hui à mi-chemin entre projet politique et concrétisation juridique.
Dans ces conditions, parler de « respect » ou de « violation » de l’état de droit en droit international apparaît largement inapproprié. Faute de contenu normatif stabilisé, la notion tend en pratique à se confondre avec l’exigence générale de respect du droit international existant. Tout en étant encore un projet inachevé, l’état de droit est néanmoins une idée-force mobilisatrice.
L’ouvrage souligne également la tension persistante entre les exigences qu’impliquerait l’avènement d’un véritable état de droit international et la structure actuelle de la société internationale. À défaut d’une refonte profonde de l’architecture du droit international, l’état de droit demeure un horizon normatif, encore largement utopique à l’échelle universelle.








