- Adel-Naim Reyhani & Gloria Golmohammadi, The Limits of Static Interests: Appreciating Asylum Seekers’ Contributions to a Country’s Economy in Article 8 ECHR Adjudication on Expulsion
- Daniel Wilsher, Between Martyrdom and Silence: Dissent, Duress, and Persecution as the Suppression of Human Rights under the Refugee Convention
- Molly Joeck, Canadian Exclusion Jurisprudence post-Febles
- Lina Jasmontaite-Zaniewicz & Júlia Zomignani Barboza, Disproportionate Surveillance: Technology-Assisted and Automated Decisions in Asylum Applications in the EU?
- Mansha Mohee, State Responsibility for Protracted Displacement: An International Legal Approach to Durable Solutions
Saturday, October 30, 2021
Melikov: Die Interpretation des völkerrechtlichen Gewaltverbots und möglicher Ausnahmen – Russische Doktrin und Praxis
Das Thema der Untersuchung ist in mehrfacher Hinsicht von zentraler Bedeutung. Die Interpretation des Gewaltverbots ist eine – wenn nicht »die« – Kernfrage des Völkerrechts. Das Thema wird aus der Sicht der Russischen Föderation und damit eines »dominant players« der internationalen Politik beleuchtet. Die Analyse beruht auf der Auswertung der russischen wissenschaftlichen Literatur, offizieller russischer Dokumente und Materialen sowie der relevanten russischen Gesetzgebung und Rechtsprechung und erfolgt damit gewissermaßen aus der Innenperspektive. Die russischen Positionen zu aktuellen Konflikten werden zudem in den historischen Kontext eingebettet; zugleich werden Spannungslagen zwischen Theorie und Praxis herausgearbeitet. Die Arbeit ist in drei große Teile untergliedert und umfasst die Vorgeschichte des sowjetischen Völkerrechts, das Völkerrecht in der Perestrojka-Zeit und das Völkerrecht der Gegenwart.
- Janne Mende, The contestation and construction of global governance authorities: A study from the global business and human rights regime
- Cédric M Koch, Varieties of populism and the challenges to Global Constitutionalism: Dangers, promises and implications
- Wayne Sandholtz, Human rights courts and global constitutionalism: Coordination through judicial dialogue
- Ben L. Murphy, Situating the accountability of the UN Security Council: Between liberal-legal and political ‘styles’ of global constitutionalism?
- Zsolt Körtvélyesi & Balázs Majtényi, Justifying supranational responses to the anti-constitutionalist challenge: Applying liberal multiculturalism as a background theory
- Alain Zysset & Antoinette Scherz, Proportionality as procedure: Strengthening the legitimate authority of the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
Christensen: The Professional Market of International Criminal Justice: Divisions of Labour and Patterns of Elite Reproduction
This article analyzes the division of labor that characterizes international criminal justice as a market of services. Using a sociological framework and building on empirical data on 996 professional agents, the analysis outlines how the market around the international criminal courts is structured by three different social groups that dominate the formal roles of judges, prosecutors and defense counsel. The article analyzes the relative positionality of these groups highlighting the low degree of mobility between them and the continued dominance of global north professionals in certain groups. On the basis of these findings, the article investigates the distinct patterns of expertise of the three groups and how it links them to the wider market of international criminal justice. The relations between the three social groups structure the market of international criminal justice and formats the social fault lines of its normative debates.
- Brigitte Stern, 2019 Freshfields Lecture: Investment Arbitration and State Sovereignty
- Case Comments
- Hiroko Yamamoto, Shreya Ramesh, & Sebastian Seelmann-Eggebert, Perenco Ecuador v Republic of Ecuador: Lessons from Perenco: Tribunal-Appointed Experts and Avoiding Double Recovery
- Ndanga Kamau, OI European Group BV v Venezuela: Developments and Divergences in the Interpretation of Articles 52(1)(a) and (d) of the ICSID Convention
- Filip Balcerzak & Jarrod Hepburn, Manchester Securities v Poland: Denial of Justice in the European Union
- Jean-Christophe Honlet & Nandakumar Srivatsa, Canepa v Spain: Some Observations Regarding the Relationship between ICSID Arbitrators and Third-Party Funders
- Dimitrij Euler, Rand and Sembi v Serbia: Transparency between Memory and Prophecy
- Andrea K Bjorklund, Lukas Vanhonnaeker, & Jean-Michel Marcoux, State Immunity as a Defense to Resist the Enforcement of ICSID Awards
- Jean Ho, Passive Investments
- Emmanuel Gaillard & Ilija Mitrev Penushliski, State Compliance with Investment Awards
- Andrea Marco Steingruber, Counterclaims: a Critical Analysis of Article 6 of the 2019 The Hague Resolution of the Institut de Droit International on the ‘Equality of Parties before International Investment Tribunals’
Wednesday, October 27, 2021
- Interview with Judge O-Gon Kwon
- Ali Masoudi Lamraski, International Committee of the Red Cross Preliminary Remarks on Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems from an IHL Perspective
- Leandro Anton M. Castro, The Humanitarian Exemption Challenge: Securing the Philippine Humanitarian Space in the Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020
- Bingling Wei, The Red Cross Society of China in the Beiyang Government Period (1912-1928): A Civil Society Organization Amidst Political Unrest
- Yoshinori Kodama, The Use of Military Units and Personnel for International Rescue and Relief Operations: Pertinent Issues Related to the 2011 East Japan Earthquake
- Lucas Alcici & Saba Papia, Displacement of the Rohingya Before the ICJ and the ICC: Same Conduct, Different Crimes in International Law?
- Mary Flanagan, Prosecution of war crimes in Australia: prospects for victim participation
Tuesday, October 26, 2021
- Jeffrey Kucik & Sergio Puig, Extending Trade Law Precedent
- Timothy Meyer, How to Treat the WTO's Problem with Precedent
- M. P. Ram Mohan & Els Reynaers Kini, Compensation for Environmental Damage: Progressively Casting a Wider Net, but What's the Catch?
- Lior Zemer & Sharon Pardo, European Union Law as Foreign Law
Traven: Law and Sentiment in International Politics: Ethics, Emotions, and the Evolution of the Laws of War
Drawing on recent research in moral psychology and neuroscience, this book argues that universal moral beliefs and emotions shaped the evolution of the laws of war, and in particular laws that protect civilians. It argues that civilian protection norms are not just a figment of the modern West, but that these norms were embryonic in earlier societies and civilizations, including Ancient China, early Islam, and medieval Europe. However, despite their ubiquity, this book argues that civilian protection rules are inherently fragile, and that their fragility lies not just in failures of compliance, but also in how moral emotions shaped the design of the law. The same beliefs and emotions that lead people to judge that it is wrong to intentionally target civilians can paradoxically constitute the basis for excusing states for incidental civilian casualties, or collateral damage. To make the laws of war work better for civilians, this book argues that we need to change how we think about the ethics of killing in war.
Monday, October 25, 2021
Roundtable: Dispute Settlement under the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreements: Perspectives from North America and Europe
Longobardo & Wallace: The 2021 ECtHR’s Decision on Georgia v Russia (II) Case and the Application of Human Rights Law to Extraterritorial Hostilities
This article discusses the findings of the European Court of Human Rights in the 2021 Georgia v Russia (II) case in relation to the applicability of the European Convention on Human Rights to the conduct of hostilities. The article describes the arguments advanced by the Court to support the idea that the Convention does not apply to extraterritorial hostilities in an international armed conflict. In light of past decisions, international humanitarian law, international human rights law, and the law of the treaties, it is argued that the Court’s conclusion is unconvincing and the arguments seem to be based on extra-legal considerations, rather than on a sound interpretation of the notion of state jurisdiction under the Convention.
This book deals with all the cases that came before the Permanent Court of International Justice (PCIJ) from 1922 to 1946, as well as those that were heard by its successor, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) from 1946 to 2020 in which interim measures of protection were either indicated or refused. The monograph shows how cases in which injunctive relief was sought were handled and how the PCIJ and the ICJ have undergone certain reforms over the years. The new approach taken by the author is to present all the matters brought before both the PCIJ and ICJ in full and to present the new requirements on the part of the ICJ that have been formulated in recent years.
- Thomas Cottier, Recalibrating the WTO Dispute Settlement System: Towards New Standards of Appellate Review
- Henry Gao, Finding a Rule-Based Solution to the Appellate Body Crisis: Looking Beyond the Multiparty Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement
- Vineet Hegde & Jan Wouters, Special and Differential Treatment Under the World Trade Organization: A Legal Typology
- Weihuan Zhou, Rethinking the (CP)TPP as a Model for Regulation of Chinese State-Owned Enterprises
- Johanna Aleria P Lorenzo, A Path Toward Sustainable Development Along the Belt and Road
- Mark McLaughlin, Investor–State Mediation and the Belt and Road Initiative: Examining the Conditions for Settlement
- Kishanthi Parella, Leveling the Field Through Transnational Regulation
- Stephen Connelly, The Tuna Bond Scandal: The Continued Lack of Transparency in Bank-to-State Credit Facilities Agreements
Sunday, October 24, 2021
- In Memoriam: Robert Cryer
- Neil Boister, Darryl Robinson, Sergey Vasiliev, Martins Paparinskis, Meagan Wong, & Ioannis Kalpouzos, In Memoriam: Robert Cryer, b. 2 August 1974 -- d. 3 January 2021
- Matthew Seet, ‘Cosmopolitan Citizenship’, Territorial Borders, and Bringing Denationalized Terrorists to Justice
- Marta Bo, Autonomous Weapons and the Responsibility Gap in light of the Mens Rea of the War Crime of Attacking Civilians in the ICC Statute
- Ady Niv, Transparent Uniforms: The Legal Status of Reservists in International Law
- Kathleen M Maloney, Ending Impunity for Forced Marriage in Conflict Zones: The Need for Greater Judicial Emphasis on the Human Rights of Girls
- Symposium: Torture by Non-state Actors
- Ginevra Le Moli, Foreword
- Ginevra Le Moli, Torture by Non-state Actors: Four Inquiries
- Tatyana Eatwell & Steven Powles, ‘Quasi-governors’ and Questions Relating to Impunity and Legal Certainty
- Émilie Pottle, What is Torture? Making the Case for Expanding the Definition to Include Private Individuals as Perpetrators
- Manfred Nowak, Can Private Actors Torture?
- Paola Gaeta, ‘Another Step in What it Means to Be Human’ — Prohibition v. Criminalization of Torture as a Private Act
- Thinking Beyond the Offence of Torture: An Interview with Andrew Clapham
- W.L. Cheah, Some Views on Torture from Asia
The Audiovisual Library of International Law is also available as a podcast on SoundCloud and can also be accessed through the relevant preinstalled applications on Apple or Google devices, or through the podcast application of your preference by searching “Audiovisual Library of International Law.”