The latest issue of the
Journal of International Dispute Settlement (Vol. 16, no. 3, September 2025) is out. Contents include:
- Special Issue: Current Challenges in International Investment Law
- Esmé Shirlow, Transparency in investment treaty arbitration: past, present, and future
- Special issue: Justice Post-ISDS
- Francesca Farrington & Nevena Jevremović, Between a rock and a hard place: the impact of replacing or abolishing ISDS on investment-affected parties
- Special Issue: Translucent Justice
- Walter Arévalo-Ramírez & Andrés Rousset-Siri, Undermining the authority of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights: cases of state’s weaponization of the value of transparency
-
Suhong Yang & Shuai Guo, Selection process of judges and members at international courts and tribunals: in search of efficient transparency
-
Gautam Mohanty & Alexandros Bakos, Revisiting transparency standards in investor–state dispute settlement vis-à-vis third-party funding: how much transparency is too much transparency?
-
Elena Abrusci, More transparency on regional human rights courts? What we (still) need to know to understand and access regional human rights justice
-
Marco Dimetto, Inscrutable procedural orders: two models of transparency in international dispute settlement (ICSID and ICJ)
-
Thomas Vogt-Geisse, Three visions of transparency in international adjudication
-
Letizia Lo Giacco, Rethinking transparency through the public–private prism: the case of the ICC–NGOs partnership
-
Ezgi Özlü, Translucent justice: strategic transparency and the legitimacy of the ECtHR
-
Hemi Mistry, Transparency as performance: the ‘As Is’ and ‘As If’ worlds of international adjudication
-
Fenghua Li, Transparency as a pathway to align ICSID arbitration with sustainable development
-
Irene Miano, De facto transparency? Investigating the practice of the International Court of Justice
-
Danae Georgoula & Lan Ngoc Nguyen, Judicial reasoning as a mask: rationalizing the transparency of the law of the sea tribunals
-
Carolina Mancuso, Procedural rules and judicial practices: a good or bad match for transparency?
-
Bruno Biazatti, The backlog-driven reform of the Initial Review of petitions in the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights
-
Editorial
- Cédric Dupont & Thomas Schultz, Trump’s tariffs: from a trade problem into an investment problem?
- Articles
-
Georgios Dimitropoulos, Investment law and the digital economy
-
George Kahale, The Mobil and Conoco cases against Venezuela: the good, the bad and the ugly
-
Yun Zhao & Yanru Chen, The evolving lex mercatoria: a game-changer for transparency in international commercial arbitration
-
Jay Tseng, Insolvency of a party in international arbitration: considerations on staying arbitration proceedings
-
Eleonora Castro, Clarifying the clean hands doctrine under general international law
-
Nektarios Papadimos, A golden mean approach to independence and impartiality in investment arbitration
-
Zelin Li, Inter-court competition in non-adjudicative activities: a case study of the International Court of Justice presidential speeches, 1991–2022
-
Daria Levina, The myth of instant success: a historical account of the Commercial Court of England and Wales
- Current Developments
- Gabrielle Marceau & Maria George, Trade, climate and differentiation: an analysis of the interaction between the ‘Principle of Common But Differentiated Responsibilities’ and the WTO agreement
-
Nikiforos Panagis, Held in suspense: the past, present, and future of the suspension of proceedings at the International Court of Justice
-
Guang Ma & Hong Wu, The proliferation of unilateral trade measures and the crisis of the multilateral trading system
