Why and how do international courts justify decisions with citations to their own case law? We argue that, like domestic review courts, international courts use precedent at least in part to convince ‘lower’ (domestic) courts of the legitimacy of judgements. Several empirical observations are consistent with this view, which are examined through a network analysis of European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) citations. First, the Court cites precedent based on the legal issues in the case, not the country of origin. Second, the Court is more careful to embed judgements in its existing case law when the expected value of persuading domestic judges is highest. These findings contribute to a developing literature that suggests international and domestic review courts develop their authority in similar ways.
Thursday, January 12, 2012
Lupu & Voeten: Precedent in International Courts: A Network Analysis of Case Citations by the European Court of Human Rights
Yonatan Lupu (Univ. of California, San Diego - Political Science) & Erik Voeten (Georgetown Univ. - School of Foreign Service and Government) have posted Precedent in International Courts: A Network Analysis of Case Citations by the European Court of Human Rights (British Journal of Political Science, forthcoming). Here's the abstract: