Stahn & El Zeidy: International Criminal Court and Complementarity: From Theory to Practice

Carsten Stahn (Universiteit Leiden - Law) & Mohamed M. El Zeidy (International Criminal Court) have published The International Criminal Court and Complementarity: From Theory to Practice (Cambridge Univ. Press 2011). Contents include:

• Carsten Stahn, Bridge over troubled waters? Complementarity themes and debates in context
• Luis Moreno-Ocampo, A positive approach to complementarity: The impact of the Office of the Prosecutor
• Juan E. Mendez, Justice and Prevention
• Silvana Arbia, Proactive complementarity – A Registrar’s perspective and plans
• Mohamed M. El Zeidy, The genesis of complementarity
• Mauro Politi, Reflections on complementarity at the Rome Conference and beyond
• William A. Schabas, The rise and fall of complementarity
• Christoph Burchard, Complementarity as global governance
• Mark A. Drumbl, Policy through complementarity: The atrocity trial as justice
• Carsten Stahn, Taking complementarity seriously: On the sense and sensibility of ‘classical’, ‘positive’ and ‘negative’ complementarity
• Payam Akhavan, International criminal justice in the era of failed states: The ICC and the self-referral debate
• Michael A. Newton, The quest for constructive complementarity
• William W. Burke-White, Reframing positive complementarity: Reflections on the First decade and insights from the U.S federal criminal justice system
• Frédéric Mégret, Too much of a good thing? Implementation and the uses of complementarity
• Héctor Olásolo & Enrique Carnero Rojo, The application of the principle of complementarity to the decision of where to open an investigation: the admissibility of ‘situations’
• Rod Rastan, Situations & Case: Defining the parameters
• Darryl Robinson, The inaction controversy: Neglected words and new opportunities
• Jo Stigen, The admissibility procedures
• Ben Batros, The evolution of the ICC jurisprudence on admissibility
• Ignaz Stegmiller, Interpretative gravity under the ICC statute: Identifying common gravity criteria
• Megan A. Fairlie & Joseph Powderly, Complementarity and burden allocation
• Harmen van der Wilt, States’ obligations to investigate and prosecute perpetrators of international crimes: The perspective of the European Court of Human Rights
• Jann K. Kleffner, The law and policy of complementarity in relation to ‘criminal proceedings’ carried out by non-state organized armed groups
• Roger S. Clark, Complementarity and the crime of aggression
• Gregory Gordon, Complementarity and alternative forms of justice: A New test for ICC admissibility
• Federica Gioia, Complementarity and ‘reverse cooperation’
• Olympia Bekou, In the hands of the state: Implementing legislation and complementarity
• Cedric Ryngaert, Horizontal complementarity
• David Tolbert & Aleksandar Kontic, The International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (‘ICTY’) and the transfer of cases and materials to national judicial authorities: Lessons in complementarity
• Fidelma Donlon, Positive complementarity in practice: ICTY rule 11bis and the use of the tribunal’s evidence in the Srebrenica trials before the Bosnian War Crimes Chamber
• Tarik Abdulhak, Complementarity of procedures: How to avoid reinventing the wheel Paul F. Seils, Making complementarity work: Maximising the limited role of the prosecutor
• Christopher Hall, Positive complementarity in action
• Morten Bergsmo, Olympia Bekou & Annika Jones, Complementarity and the construction of national ability
• Kai Ambos, The Colombian Peace Process (Law 975 of 2005) and the ICC’s principle of complementarity
• Robert Cryer, Darfur: Complementarity as the drafters intended?
• Sarah Nouwen, Complementarity in Uganda: Domestic diversity or international imposition?
• Marieke Wierda & Michael Otim, Courts, Conflict and Complementarity in Uganda
• Phil Clark, Chasing cases: The ICC and the politics of state referral in the Democratic Republic of Congo and Uganda
• Marlies Glasius, A problem, not a solution: Complementarity in the Central African Republic and Democratic Republic of Congo
• Christine Alai & Njonjo Mue, Complementarity and the impact of the Rome Statute and the International Criminal Court in Kenya