Tuesday, July 19, 2011

Sloss, Ramsey, & Dodge: International Law in the U.S. Supreme Court: Continuity and Change

David L. Sloss (Santa Clara Univ. - Law), Michael D. Ramsey (Univ. of San Diego - Law), & William S. Dodge (Univ. of California - Hastings College of the Law) have published International Law in the U.S. Supreme Court: Continuity and Change (Cambridge Univ. Press 2011). Contents include:
  • David L. Sloss, Michael D. Ramsey & William S. Dodge, International law in the Supreme Court, 1789–1860
  • Duncan B. Hollis, Treaties in the Supreme Court, 1861–1900
  • David J. Bederman, Customary international law in the Supreme Court, 1861–1900
  • Thomas H. Lee & David L. Sloss, International law as an interpretive tool in the Supreme Court, 1861–1900
  • John Fabian Witt, A social history of international law: historical commentary, 1861–1900
  • Michael P. Van Alstine, Treaties in the Supreme Court, 1901–1945
  • Michael D. Ramsey, Customary international law in the Supreme Court, 1901–1945
  • Roger P. Alford, International law as an interpretive tool in the Supreme Court, 1901–1945
  • Edward A. Purcell, Jr., Varieties and complexities of doctrinal change: historical commentary, 1901–1945
  • Paul B. Stephan, Treaties in the Supreme Court, 1946–2000
  • William S. Dodge, Customary international law in the Supreme Court, 1946–2000
  • Melissa A. Waters, International law as an interpretive tool in the Supreme Court, 1946–2000
  • Martin S. Flaherty, Global power in an age of rights: historical commentary, 1946–2000
  • Lori F. Damrosch, Medellin and Sanchez-Llamas: treaties from John Jay to John Roberts
  • John O. McGinnis, Sosa and the derivation of customary international law
  • Mark Tushnet, International law and constitutional interpretation in the twenty-first century: change and continuity
  • Ralf Michaels, Empagran's empire: international law and statutory interpretation in the U.S. Supreme Court of the twenty-first century
  • David Golove, The Supreme Court, the war on terror, and the American just war constitutional tradition