Tuesday, April 5, 2016

Barnes & Tzevelekos: Beyond Responsibility to Protect: Generating Change in International Law

Richard Barnes (Univ. of Hull - Law) & Vassilis Tzevelekos (Univ. of Hull - Law) have published Beyond Responsibility to Protect: Generating Change in International Law (Intersentia 2016). Contents include:
  • Andre Nollkaemper, Foreword
  • Richard A. Barnes & Vassilis P. Tzevelekos, Beyond Responsibility to Protect: Ceci n’est pas une pipe
  • Henry Jones, The Kantian Defence of Murder
  • Markus P. Beham & Ralph R.A. Janik, A ‘Responsibility to Democratise’? The ‘Responsibility to Protect’ in Light of Regime Change and the ‘Pro-Democratic’ Intervention Discourse
  • Tony Ward, Commentary: Between Kant and Al-Shabaab
  • Nabil Hajjami, The Institutionalisation of the Responsibility to Protect
  • John Heieck, The Responsibility Not to Veto Revisited. How the Duty to Prevent Genocide as a Jus Cogens Norm Imposes a Legal Duty Not to Veto on the Five Permanent Members of the Security Council
  • Julia Schmidt, The EU and the Responsibility to Protect: The Case of Libya, Mali and Syria
  • Nigel D. White, Commentary: International Institutions and their Role in R2P
  • Antal Berkes, De Facto Regimes and the Responsibility to Protect
  • Jennifer Dee Halbert, ‘Guilty’ Governments and ‘Legitimate’ Leadership: The Concept of ‘National Authorities’ under the R2P
  • Hitoshi Nasu, Commentary: Who Cares? The Primary Bearer of the Responsibility to Protect
  • Humberto Cantu Rivera, On the Responsibility to Protect and the Business and Human Rights Agenda
  • Kasey L. McCall-Smith, Tides of Change – The State, Business and the Human
  • Lucas Lixinski, Commentary: The Responsibility to Protect and Non-State (Corporate) Actors – More of the Same?
  • Sophie Rondeau, The Responsibility to Protect Doctrine, and the Duty of the International Community to Reinforce International Humanitarian Law and its Protective Value for Civilian Populations
  • Raphael van Steenberghe, The Responsibility to Protect in Armed Conflict: A Step Forward for the Protection of Civilians?
  • David Turns, Commentary: On the Intersection of the Responsibility to Protect, the Protection of Civilians and International Humanitarian Law in Contemporary Armed Conflicts
  • Vito Todeschini, The Place of Aggression in the Responsibility to Protect Doctrine
  • Barbara Sonczyk, The Impact of the Responsibility to Protect on the Protection of Peacekeeping Missions under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court
  • Lindsay Moir, Commentary: R2P and its Consequences for International Criminal Law: Crimes as a Justification for the Use of Force
  • Ludovica Poli, The ICJ Judgment in the Genocide Convention Case: Is R2P Drawing New Horizons for the Law on State Responsibility?
  • Tomoko Yamashita, Responsibility to Protect as a Basis for ‘Judicial Humanitarian Intervention’
  • Lenneke Sprik, Military Commanders as Bystanders to International Crimes: A Responsibility to Protect?
  • Elena Katselli, Commentary: R2P as a Transforming and Transformative Concept in the Context of Responsibility as Liability
  • Nicholas Tsagourias, R2P: An Inquiry into its Transformative Potential
  • Jean d’Aspremont, The Transformative Agendas of R2P Discourses in International Law