Tuesday, April 19, 2022

New Issue: Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law

The latest issue of the Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law (Vol. 31, no. 1, April 2022) is out. Contents include:
  • Special Issue: Human Rights and the Climate Change Crisis
    • Mara Tignino & Makane Moïse Mbengue, Climate change at the crossroads of human rights: The right to a healthy environment, the right to water and the right to development
    • Philippe Cullet, Confronting inequality beyond sustainable development: The case for eco-human rights and differentiation
    • Margaretha Wewerinke-Singh, A human rights approach to energy: Realizing the rights of billions within ecological limits
    • Elsabé Boshoff, Rethinking the premises underlying the right to development in African human rights jurisprudence
    • Elena Cima, The right to a healthy environment: Reconceptualizing human rights in the face of climate change
    • Helen Keller & Angela Hefti, Bringing the right to water into the spotlight: A civil right before the European Court of Human Rights?
    • Jasper Krommendijk, Beyond Urgenda: The role of the ECHR and judgments of the ECtHR in Dutch environmental and climate litigation
  • Regular Articles
    • Mirella Miettinen & Sabaa Ahmad Khan, Pharmaceutical pollution: A weakly regulated global environmental risk
    • Mengxing Lu & Michael Faure, Does the tiger have teeth? A critical examination of the toolbox approach of environmental law enforcement in China
    • Junghwan Choi, The legal status of Particularly Sensitive Sea Areas (PSSAs): Challenges and improvements for PSSA resolutions
    • Nikolas Sellheim & Otava Ojanperä, Indigenous youth and international conservation law: Five case studies
    • Paul Martin, Solange Teles da Silva, Maurício Duarte dos Santos, & Carolina Dutra, Governance and metagovernance systems for the Amazon
  • Case Note
    • Magdalena Porzeżyńska, Case C-24/19 (A and others): How to ensure effet utile of the Strategic Environmental Assessment Directive?