The latest issue of
Questions of International Law / Questioni di Diritto Internazionale (nos. 15-17, 2015) is out. Contents include:
- On the relationship between IHL and IHRL ‘where it matters’ once more: Assessing the position of the European Court of Human Rights after Hassan and Jaloud
- Introduced by Marco Pertile and Chiara Vitucci
- Ziv Bohrer, Human Rights vs Humanitarian Law or rights vs obligations: Reflections following the rulings in Hassan and Jaloud
- Silvia Borelli, Jaloud v Netherlands and Hassan v United Kingdom: Time for a principled approach in the application of the ECHR to military action abroad
-
Does the ‘living instrument’ doctrine always lead to ‘evolutive interpretation’? Some remarks after Hassan v the United Kingdom
- Introduced by Francesca de Vittor and Cesare Pitea
-
Luigi Crema, Subsequent practice in Hassan v United Kingdom: When things seem to go wrong in the life of a living instrument
-
Eirik Bjorge, What is living and what is dead in the European Convention on Human Rights? A Comment on Hassan v United Kingdom
- For all or for some? Functional immunity of State officials before the International Law Commission
-
Introduced by Beatrice Bonafé, Micaela Frulli and Paolo Palchetti
-
Riccardo Pisillo Mazzeschi, The functional immunity of State officials from foreign jurisdiction: A critique of the traditional theories
-
Gionata Buzzini, The enduring validity of immunity ratione materiae: A reply to Professor Pisillo Mazzeschi
-
Philippa Webb, Comment on ‘The functional immunity of State officials from foreign jurisdiction: A critique of the traditional theories’
-
Chimène Keitner, Functional immunity of State officials before the International Law Commission: The ‘who’ and the ‘what’
