We argue that competitive diffusion is a driver of the trend toward international investment agreements (IIAs) with stricter investment rules, namely defensive moves of developing countries concerned about foreign direct investment (FDI) diversion in favor of competing host countries. Accounting for spatial dependence in the formation of bilateral investment treaties (BITs) and preferential trade agreements (PTAs) that contain investment provisions, we find that the increase in agreements with stricter provisions on investor-state dispute settlement and pre-establishment national treatment is a contagious process. Specifically, a developing country is more likely to sign an agreement with weak investment provisions if other developing countries that compete for FDI from the same developed country have previously signed agreements with similarly weak provisions. Conversely, contagion in agreements with strong provisions exclusively derives from agreements with strong provisions that other FDI-competing developing countries have previously signed with a specific developed source country of FDI.
Saturday, March 28, 2015
Neumayer, Nunnenkamp, & Roy: Are Stricter Investment Rules Contagious?
Eric Neumayer (London School of Economics), Peter Nunnenkamp (Univ. of Kiel), & Martin Roy (World Trade Organization) have posted Are Stricter Investment Rules Contagious? Host Country Competition for Foreign Direct Investment Through International Agreements. Here's the abstract: