Michal Bobek (College of Europe - Law) has published
Selecting Europe's Judges: A Critical Review of the Appointment Procedures to the European Courts (Oxford Univ. Press 2015). Contents include:
- Michal Bobek, The Changing Nature of Selection Procedures to the European Courts
- Henri de Waele, Not Quite the Bed that Procrustes Built: Dissecting the System for Selecting Judges at the Court of Justice of the European Union
- Damian Chalmers, Judicial Performance, Membership, and Design at the Court of Justice
- Jean-Marc Sauvé, Selecting European Union's Judges: The Practice of the Article 255 Panel
- Georges Vandersanden, The Real Test - How to Contribute to a Better Justice: The Experience of the Civil Service Tribunal
- Koen Lemmens, (S)electing Judges for Strasbourg: A (Dis)appointing Process?
- David Kosar, Selecting Strasbourg Judges: A Critique
- Armin von Bogdandy & Christoph Krenn, On the Democratic Legitimacy of Europe's Judges: A Principled and Comparative Reconstruction of the Selection Procedures
- Aida Torres Pérez, Can Judicial Selection Secure Judicial Independence? Constraining State Governments in Selecting International Judges
- Alberto Alemanno, How Transparent is Transparent Enough? Balancing Access to Information versus Privacy in European Judicial Selections
- Bilyana Petkova, Spillovers in Selecting Europe's Judges: Will the Criterion of Gender Equality Make it to Luxembourg?
- Daniel Kelemen, Selection, Appointment, and Legitimacy: A Political Perspective
- Mikael Rask Madsen, The Legitimization Strategies of European Courts: The Case of the European Court of Human Rights
- Michal Bobek, Finding the European Hercules
