Tuesday, June 2, 2026

Stoyanova & McGrogan: The Limits of Positive Obligations in Human Rights Law: From Protection to Coercion

Vladislava Stoyanova
(Lund Univ. - Law) & David McGrogan (Northumbria Univ. - Law) have published The Limits of Positive Obligations in Human Rights Law: From Protection to Coercion (Hart Publishing 2026). Here's the abstract:

There is nowadays no dispute in human rights doctrine over whether rights entail positive duties on the part of the state at the level of principle. But there has been surprisingly little academic commentary devoted to the question of whether there are, or should be, limits placed on how far those obligations extend. Similarly, there has been little scholarly attention paid to the question of how causation can be reasonably attributed in the context of violations of positive obligations. And there are very few sociological explanations provided as to why positive human rights obligations appear to be expanding without principled limits in the first place.

This volume assembles the work of a range of leading scholars in international human rights law to fill these gaps in the literature. Each of its 11 substantive chapters addresses an aspect of positive obligations with a particular focus on issues concerning limits. Taken together, they provide the first serious attempt to grapple critically with the subject of the limits, causality and scope of positive obligations theoretically and doctrinally. This makes the book essential reading for scholars of human rights law.

The ebook editions of this book are available open access.

Call for Papers: The Impact of Neutrality on Research and Knowledge Production in Legal Scholarship

A call for papers has been issued for early career researchers for a workshop on "The Impact of Neutrality on Research and Knowledge Production in Legal Scholarship," to take place December 9-10, 2026, at Ruhr University Bochum. The call is here.

Conference: Securitisation and International Law in Asia

On June 28, 2026, the Japan Chapter of the Asian Society of International Law will host its 17th Annual Conference, in Osaka (Umeda) and online (hybrid). The theme is: "Securitisation and International Law in Asia." Details are here.

Saliternik & Shlomo-Agon: Different Frontier, Same Legal Script? On the Course of Replicating Earth's Patterns in Space

Michal Saliternik (Netanya Academic College - Law) & Sivan Shlomo-Agon (Bar-Ilan Univ. - Law) have posted Different Frontier, Same Legal Script? On the Course of Replicating Earth's Patterns in Space (Modern Law Review, forthcoming). Here's the abstract:
As states and private actors expand their activities in outer space, the international legal framework governing this domain risks extending longstanding structures of global inequality beyond Earth. This article examines how international space law, shaped by a broader disciplinary pattern of reactive legal development, is poised to reproduce terrestrial disparities in the extraterrestrial realm. Drawing on parallels across international legal regimes, it demonstrates how reactive governance often disadvantages less powerful actors through various interlocking mechanisms: transforming early movers' advantages into legal prescriptions; enabling unilateral norm-setting amid international legal voids; shifting environmental burdens onto latecomers; sidelining equity concerns during crisis-driven lawmaking; and discounting foreseeable-yet-distant risks disproportionately borne by vulnerable populations. By tracing these distributive dynamics, the article underscores the need and possibility for more proactive alternatives in space governance. Though the window for action is narrowing, space law still retains enough plasticity to be reoriented before current inequalities become legally entrenched.

Kawai: Enabling Constraints in International Legal Discourse on the ICC’s Jurisdiction: The Case of the ‘Oslo Argument’ in the State of Palestine Situation

Keiichiro Kawai (Okayama Univ. - Law) has posted Enabling Constraints in International Legal Discourse on the ICC’s Jurisdiction: The Case of the ‘Oslo Argument’ in the State of Palestine Situation (International Criminal Law Review, forthcoming). Here's the abstract:
The ICC’s arrest warrants against Netanyahu/Gallant reignited debates over the nature of the Court’s jurisdiction with the focal point called the ‘Oslo Argument’, which contended that the Hague lacked jurisdiction over Israelis because Palestine lacked it under the Oslo Accords. The resulting submissions by amici curiae and parties before the Court, unprecedented in number, constitute a microcosm of contemporary international legal discourse over the ICC’s jurisdiction and therefore warrant close discourse analysis. The analysis offers an internal understanding of the argumentative structure therein and illuminates two systematized discursive regularities. One is the ‘delegation-based approach’, marked by assemblage of reifying and state-centric jurisdictional thinking with atomistic conceptions of the Court and the international order. Another is the ‘non-delegation-based approach’, grounded in a relational and autonomous conception of international jurisdiction with cosmopolitanism. Building on these findings, the concluding section explores possible strategies for lawyers, ranging from either/or choice to interstitial modes of argumentation.

Monday, June 1, 2026

Webinar: The Future of the United Nations Organisation, If Any

On June 24, 2026, a fourth webinar will be held in the ESIL Conversations series “Multilateralism in Times of Unilateralism.” The topic is: “The Future of the United Nations Organisation, If Any.” Details are here.

Webinar: Diversity and Teaching International Law

On June 17, 2026, the European Society of International Law will host a webinar on "Diversity and Teaching International Law." This event, part of the ESIL Teaching Corner Webinar Series, will address a wide range of perspectives on teaching and classroom practice, including cultural diversity, decolonisation, gender, the geographical diversity of international legal practice, student inclusivity, multilingualism, and the diverse backgrounds of educators. Details are here.

Call for Papers: ASIL/ESIL Works-in-Progress Workshop on the Law or Practice of International Organizations

The International Organizations Interest Group of the American Society of International Law and the European Society of International Law have issued a call for papers for their biannual virtual academic workshop on the law or practice of international organizations. Here's the call:

The International Organizations Interest Group (IOIG) of the American Society of International Law (ASIL) and the European Society of International Law (ESIL) are delighted to announce a call for proposals for their biannual virtual workshop of academic works in progress addressing the law or practice of international organizations.

The workshop will provide an opportunity for scholars to receive feedback from their peers and experts in international organizations law. The tentative date to hold the workshop is 15 February 2027, at a time convenient for the largest number of selected authors.

To be considered, please send an abstract of around 400 to 800 words to fionamangan@gmail.com and igioesil@gmail.com by 30 June 2026. Selected authors will be expected to submit article- or chapter-length papers by 1 December 2026. Co-authorship is permitted. We also welcome expressions of interest from potential reviewers.

Don't hesitate to get in touch with fionamangan@gmail.com or igioesil@gmail.com with any questions.

Webinar Series: Board of Peace: Might Makes Right, Again? – Inquiries on the Current Shaping of Global Governance

The journal Athena - Critical Inquiries in Law, Philosophy and Globalization will hold a webinar series, beginning on June 5, 2026, on "Board of Peace: Might Makes Right, Again? – Inquiries on the Current Shaping of Global Governance." The schedule is here.

New Issue: Europa Ethnica

The latest issue of Europa Ethnica (Vol. 83, nos. 1/2, 2026). Contents include:
  • Beiträge
    • Sia Spiliopoulou Åkermark, Human Rights Challenged and Defended – A Survey of Recent Legal Developments around Europe. Too Much or Too Little Human Rights Protection?
    • Giuseppe Cataldi, The Common European Asylum System (CEAS) and the externalisation of migration control and management – a challenge to basic international refugee protection standards
    • Harald Christian Scheu, 30 Years of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities – Reconsidering the Advisory Committee’s Monitoring Practice
    • János Fiala-Butora, Potential and limitations of the Advisory Committee’s monitoring process
    • Stefan Oeter, Implementing the FCNM and the Charter for Regional or Minority Languages – A Comparison
    • Gudmundur Alfredsson, Greenland’s Choices: Independence, Free Association or Integration

Sunday, May 31, 2026

Kulick: International Courts and World Disorder

Andreas Kulick (Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz - Law) has posted International Courts and World Disorder. Here's the abstract:
What do international courts have to offer when faced with raw power? In a state of international disorder, respect for international law erodes and so does the respect for international courts and tribunals (ICs) and their decisions. An IC decision constitutes an international legal obligation. It binds the disputing party states as any other rule of international law does. Regardless, whether international affairs are in a relative state of order or disorder, international actors, above all States, must observe international law. Yet, what if a State does not play along – and is powerful enough to also withstand any international legal or political measures seeking to enforce the IC decision in question? Russia, for example, flatly ignored that the International Court of Justice (ICJ), on 16 March 2022, ordered it to halt its invasion of Ukraine and, as of May 2026, continues its aggression on Ukrainian territory. This piece investigates the effects of IC decisions when pushed to the margins by powerful States that can do so – and can, at least in first instance, get away with it. Such disregard for international judicial decisions occurring in higher frequencies indicates, at least from the prespective of international law, a state of international disorder. However, even in these situations, when pushed to the side, IC decisions are not pointless. They may have at least four effects that are interconnected and potentially reinforce each other, thereby providing a minimal contribution to the integrity of the international legal system.

Thursday, May 28, 2026

Aust & Rodiles: Carving Out the City from the State: Charter Cities and the Quest for New Urban Futures

Helmut Aust (Free Univ. of Berlin - Law; Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law) & Alejandro Rodiles (Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México) have posted Carving Out the City from the State: Charter Cities and the Quest for New Urban Futures (University of Toronto Law Journal, forthcoming). Here's the abstract:

The idea of building new cities from scratch is gaining new popularity. A particular form of these endeavors relates to the construction of so-called "charter cities" which would be built on the territory of a given state, but would find themselves in more or less complete independence from the legal framework of the host state. Going back to ideas propagated by former World Bank Chief Economist and Nobel laureate Paul Romer, the idea behind charter cities is a decoupling of cities from the state.

Ideally, these cities would be carved out of state jurisdiction almost entirely. This article discusses this phenomenon both in the light of a now apparently failed attempt at implementing this plan in the case of Prospéra in Honduras, but also in the light of its broader historical, conceptual and political implications. As the article demonstrates, charter cities demonstrate a considerable overlap with concepts like special economic zones. Also other attempts at decoupling territories from states like seasteading projects are based on similar ideological underpinnings.These shared conceptual undercurrents relate to techno-libertarian concepts and their growing international influence finds resonance in recent attempts of post-conflict peace-building propagated by the US administration. The article critically assesses these developments and points to the dangers that such new urban futures present.

Tuesday, May 26, 2026

Oyarzabal: International Law for Diplomats

Mario J.A. Oyarzabal
(Legal Adviser, Argentine Foreign Ministry; Member, International Law Commission) has published International Law for Diplomats (Brill | Nijhoff 2026). Here's the abstract:
The purpose of this book is to provide diplomats worldwide - both lawyers and non-lawyers - with basic tools to address the main international legal issues they may encounter both bilaterally and in multilateral negotiations and forums. It features chapter from current or former legal advisers to the ministries of foreign affairs of a representative group of countries alongside the legal advisers of international organizations and institutions with extensive experience in their respective fields. The book offers a practical perspective, without delving into abstract theoretical discussions or issues which, despite being relevant in other contexts, are less so in the diplomatic field.

Sunday, May 24, 2026

Criddle & Fox-Decent: Mandatory Cooperation Under International Law

Evan J. Criddle
(College of William and Mary - Law) & Evan Fox-Decent (McGill Univ. - Law) have published Mandatory Cooperation Under International Law (Cambridge Univ. Press 2026). Here's the abstract:
Humanity in the twenty-first century faces serious global challenges and crises, including pandemics, nuclear proliferation, violent extremism, refugee migration, and climate change. None of these calamities can be averted without robust international cooperation. Yet, national leaders often assume that because their states are sovereign under international law, they are free to opt in or out of international cooperation as they see fit. This book challenges conventional wisdom by showing that international law requires states to cooperate with one another to address matters of international concern-even in the absence of treaty-based obligations. Within the past several decades, requirements to cooperate have become firmly embedded in the international legal regimes governing oceans, transboundary rivers, disputed territories, pollution, international security, and human rights, among other topics. Whenever states address matters of common concern, international law requires that they work together as good neighbors for their mutual benefit. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.

Saturday, May 23, 2026

Webinar: Second World Approaches to International Law (SWAIL)

On June 9, 2026, a webinar will be held on "Second World Approaches to International Law (SWAIL)." Details are here.

Friday, May 22, 2026

Research Platform: EGSTradeHub.org

Nicolette Butler (Univ. of Manchester - Law) and Jasem Tarawneh (Queen Mary Univ. of London - Law) have launched a new online repository for information related to international trade in environmental goods and services (EGS): EGSTradeHub.org. Here's a description:

EGSTradeHub.org is a new one-stop resource bringing together academic research, legal materials, policy documents, institutional resources, events, reports, and commentary relating broadly to Environmental Goods and Services (EGS), trade and environment, and climate-aligned trade governance. Developed by Dr Nicolette Butler (University of Manchester) and Dr Jasem Tarawneh (Queen Mary University of London), the platform is designed to help users navigate what is often a fragmented and difficult-to-access landscape by consolidating a wide range of materials into a single, searchable, and regularly updated resource.

The Hub serves as a key resource for academics, students, policymakers, negotiators, practitioners, NGOs, and others working across international trade, environmental governance, and sustainable development. The project team also warmly welcomes suggestions and contributions of relevant publications, reports, events, databases, and other materials to help ensure the resource remains comprehensive and up to date. The website is available here.

Thursday, May 21, 2026

al Attar & Smith: Emancipating International Law: Confronting the Violence of Racialized Boundaries

Mohsen al Attar
(Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool Univ.) & Claire Smith have published Emancipating International Law: Confronting the Violence of Racialized Boundaries (Oxford Univ. Press 2026). Here's the abstract:

While mainstream international legal scholarship has long treated race as a peripheral concern-or a historic injustice to be remembered but not redressed-this volume argues that racialisation is foundational to the discipline, underpinning its doctrines, epistemes, and interlocutors. Emancipating International Law explores the many ways racial hierarchy, systemic oppression, and global white supremacy shape international law. Bringing together leading and emerging scholars, the collection moves beyond qualifying whether international law is racist to explore how racial hierarchies are embedded in its structures and continue to evolve through legal and institutional practice.

Divided into five sections, the book begins by situating international law's racialised boundaries within its colonial, capitalist, and chauvinist afterlives, exposing how white ignorance and race-thinking underpin legal norms, from sovereignty to jus cogens. It then examines racial stratification across legal institutions, including investment law, refugee law, and the Genocide Convention. The third section extends this critique to human rights, revealing the ways in which even an emancipatory paradigm can bolster racial injustices. The penultimate section unpacks racial hierarchies in disparate societies, including Brazil, India, and Japan, as well as the frontiers of nation-states. The volume concludes with a powerful discussion of the role of activism and alternative epistemologies in racial justice struggles, and the limits of international law's capacity for anti-racist transformation.

Wednesday, May 20, 2026

New Issue: Journal of Global Health Law

The latest issue of the Journal of Global Health Law (Vol. 2, no. 2, 2025) is out. Contents include:
  • Special Issue: One Health and Global Health Law
    • Carmen Bullón Caro, One Health as an emerging legal principle: foundations, normative content, and regulatory implications
    • Adam Strobeyko & Daniela Morich, One Health, many laws: the promise and limits of mutually supportive lawmaking in a fragmented legal landscape
    • Alexandra Finch & Benjamin Mason Meier, One Health as a foundation for addressing AMR under global health law
    • Gabriel Armas-Cardona & Antje Risius, Understanding barriers to One Health implementation: systematic review of One Health governance beyond the Quadripartite coalition
    • Katherine Ginsbach, Stefania Negri, Kashish Aneja, Emanuele Cesta, Sandro Bonfigli, & Sam Halabi, Legal preparedness for One Health: evolving legal and institutional frameworks for improved global health security
    • Voices from the field: interview with Carlos Gonçalo das Neves

Tuesday, May 19, 2026

New Issue: International Community Law Review

The latest issue of the International Community Law Review (Vol. 28, nos. 2-3, 2026) is out. Contents include:
  • Special Issue: Second World Approaches to International Law
    • Marek J. Wasiński & Patryk I. Labuda, Special Issue Editorial: Second World Approaches to International Law
    • Eric Loefflad, Steppe and Forest between World Orders: Locating the Political Geography of Eastern Europe in the Deep Time of International Law
    • Daniel R. Quiroga-Villamarín, Cuba Libre? Pan-Americanism, the 1962 Missiles Crisis, and the Geopolitical Boundaries of the “Second World”
    • Tomasz Lachowski, Imperialism, Genocide and International Law in the Bloodlands in the Past and Present
    • Tamás Hoffmann, A Region without Agency? Finding the Absent Eastern European Voice in the History of International Law
    • Polina Kulish & Ciarán Burke, Reviving the ‘Second World’? Rethinking the Eurasian Economic Union through the SWAIL Lens
    • Gor Samvel, The Soviets, Colonialism, and Legal Consciousness: Rethinking Armenia’s Relationship with International Law

Monday, May 18, 2026

Call for Submissions: International Humanitarian Law and Courts (Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law)

The Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law has issued a call for submissions for its Volume 29 (2026) on the theme "International Humanitarian Law and Courts." The call is here. The deadline for abstracts is June 19, 2026.

Grant: Sovereignty disputes and the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea: A public order perspective

Thomas D. Grant
(Univ. of Cambridge - Lauterpacht Centre for International Law) has published Sovereignty disputes and the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea: A public order perspective (Manchester Univ. Press 2026). Here's the abstract:
Because maritime questions are often admixed with territorial sovereignty questions, parties sometimes seek to settle them together. Jurisdiction under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea-UNCLOS-according to the received view does not encompass disputes concerning territorial sovereignty. In this book, international law scholar and practitioner Thomas D. Grant argues that the received view overstates the exclusion of sovereignty disputes. In Coastal State Rights, UNCLOS Annex VII arbitrators overstated the scope of the term 'sovereignty dispute' as well, an error of definition compounded when they ignored evidence probative as to whether a sovereignty dispute exists. Examining UNCLOS, its drafting history, and decades of decided cases, Sovereignty Disputes and the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea relates an important problem of international dispute settlement to the public order of which UNCLOS forms part.

Citeroni: Systemic Economic Offences as International Crimes: Theorising a New Paradigm of Mass Criminality

Nicole Citeroni
has published Systemic Economic Offences as International Crimes: Theorising a New Paradigm of Mass Criminality (Hart Publishing 2026). Here's the abstract:

This open access book asks whether international economic crime can qualify as an international crime and be prosecuted as such.

Taking a four-part approach to the question, it traces the origins of the concept of international economic crime, and draws the line between ordinary economic crimes and economic offences of international significance. To this end, it examines six cases involving the commissions of serious economic crimes in different regions of the world, including Europe, the Americas and Africa: the crime of grand corruption in the Petrobras case; the theft of natural resources in the Niger Delta region and Liberia; the international money-laundering scheme in the Bolichicos case; the crime of financing terrorism in the Chiquita case; the Volkswagen conspiracy case in the US and the Haarde case related to gross-negligence in preventing serious economic damage. It then goes on to discuss a potential sui generis category of international economic crimes, before considering the advantages and the challenges of the multilevel enforcement system of international criminal justice in prosecuting such crimes.

New Issue: Ocean Development & International Law

The latest issue of Ocean Development & International Law (Vol. 57, no. 1, 2026) is out. Contents include:
  • Articles
    • Constantinos Yiallourides, Lennart Westmark & Alexander Proelss, Cross-Border CO2 Transport and Storage Networks in Europe through “Arrangements” under the London Protocol
    • Yoshifumi Tanaka, Three Functions of Due Diligence Obligations in the Prevention of Vessel-Source Marine Pollution from Arctic Shipping
    • Krittika Singh, Environmental Impact Assessment for Deep-Sea Mining: From Exploration to Exploitation and Relevance of the BBNJ Agreement
  • Special Section: Protection of Fishers in Southeast Asia under International Law
    • Natalie Klein, Andrew Blackie & Dita Liliansa, Abuses in the Southeast Asian Fishing Industry as Violations of International Law
    • Andrea Longo, Flag State Jurisdiction and the Protection of Human Rights in Southeast Asia
    • Dita Liliansa, Home State Jurisdiction over Corporate Harms at Sea in Fisheries in Southeast Asia
    • Natalie Klein, The Potential Role of Regional Fisheries Management Organizations in Addressing International Human Rights Violations in Fisheries in Southeast Asia
    • Arron N. Honniball, Combating Forced Labour in Fisheries Through Trade Restrictions: First Steps and Their Consistency with International Law

Sunday, May 17, 2026

Conference: 21st Annual Conference of the European Society of International Law

On September 3-5, 2026, the European Society of International Law will hold its 21st Annual Conference in Málaga. The theme is: "International Law and Conflict: An Enduring Tension?" The program is here. Registration is here.

Saturday, May 16, 2026

Hettihewa: Jugend im Völkerrecht

Julian Hettihewa
has published Jugend im Völkerrecht (Duncker & Humblot 2026). Here's the abstract:
Die Jugend bildete bisher eine Randerscheinung in der völkerrechtswissenschaftlichen Literatur. Indes kommt ihr eine beachtliche normative und institutionelle Aufmerksamkeit in der Praxis des Völkerrechts zu. Mit dieser Arbeit werden die Begriffe der Jugend und der jungen Menschen als völkerrechtswissenschaftliche Analysekategorien eingeordnet und geformt. Sie bilden das Herzstück eines »Jugendansatzes im Völkerrecht«, der sich existierenden rechtskritischen Ansätzen zuordnet. Dieser Jugendansatz wird erstmals systematisch vorgestellt und angewendet. Es wird gezeigt, wie mit den Kategorien der Jugend und der jungen Menschen versteckte Annahmen, Interessen, Geschichten und Stimmen zum Vorschein gebracht werden können. Dabei werden völkerrechtliche Institutionen, Normen und Konzepte einer Untersuchung und Kritik zugeführt. Dies bereitet die Grundlage für einen distinkten Forschungsbereich, der sich der Jugend und jungen Menschen im Völkerrecht widmet.

New Issue: Michigan Journal of International Law

The latest issue of the Michigan Journal of International Law (Vol. 47, no. 1, 2026) is out. Contents include:
  • Harlan Grant Cohen, The International Order, International Law, and the Definition of Security
  • Julian Arato, The Institution of Exceptions: Justification in Trade and Investment Treaties
  • Pearle M. Lipinski, Escape Probability: Rethinking Wartime Protection of Nuclear Facilities

Friday, May 15, 2026

Schneiderman: A Sociology of International Investment Law: Themes from Max Weber

David Schneiderman
(Univ. of Toronto - Law) has published A Sociology of International Investment Law: Themes from Max Weber (Oxford Univ. Press 2026). This is an open access title. Here's the abstract:

A Sociology of International Investment Law applies methods associated with the sociologist Max Weber to illuminate aspects of international investment law - a regime made up of thousands of treaties that protect foreign investors from state action diminishing the value of their investments. By applying many of Weber's key themes associated with legal modernity - legitimacy, rationality, domination, bureaucracy, and charisma - the book conscripts tools of analysis that enable the testing of many of investment law's operating assumptions.

A Sociology of International Investment Law Law is premised on the belief that theory informs practice and that enlisting aspects of Weber's work illuminates the contemporary practice of, and debates over, international investment law. Utilizing Weber's themes and methods, results in a deeper appreciation of the connections of international investment law has with classical social theory. The book also reveals how the field fails to measure up to many of the analytical challenges that Weber's sociological interventions provoke. This book offers an exploration of the commonalities, differences, and blind spots shared by this relatively new international legal field with one of the most influential theorists of modernity.

Thursday, May 14, 2026

Call for Papers: 2027 ESIL Research Forum

A call for papers has been issued for the 2027 ESIL Research Forum, which will take place April 22–23, 2027, and hosted by the Faculty of Law, University of Maribor, Slovenia. The topic is: “The European Union, the Council of Europe, and Other Regional Organisations in a Changing World.” The Forum promotes engagement with research in progress by members of the Society in the early stages of their careers. The call is here. The deadline is September 30, 2026.

Tuesday, May 12, 2026

Hakimi: International Law and Power Politics: On Koskenniemi's Perceptions of Justice

Monica Hakimi (Columbia Univ. - Law) has posted International Law and Power Politics: On Koskenniemi's Perceptions of Justice. Here's the abstract:
Martti Koskenniemi wrote "Perceptions of Justice" against the backdrop of the 2003 Iraq War. The piece draws a stark distinction between American and European conceptions of justice--and approaches to international law. Over twenty years later, his distinction might still (or again) resonate. This retrospective analyzes it in light of his other work and more contemporary events, arguing that it is a mix of misguided and confused. The United States and Europe have for decades, if not centuries, been profoundly entwined; each has significantly shaped and been shaped by its relationship with the other. The urgent question now is not what our distinct, essential characteristics might be but how we will redefine ourselves going forward, given the enormous challenges that we both, and the world more generally, confront. We are unlikely to make much progress on this question so long as we imagine, as Koskenniemi and the U.S. Trump Administration both seem to do, that if law does not constrain power, it must just be the sieve through which power runs.

Benvenisti: Trustees of Humanity: From Juridical Metaphor to Legal Concept

Eyal Benvenisti (Tel Aviv Univ. - Law) has posted Trustees of Humanity: From Juridical Metaphor to Legal Concept. Here's the abstract:
The International Court of Justice's 2025 Advisory Opinion on Obligations of States in Respect of Climate Change deploys the phrase 'trustees of humanity' in the context of intergenerational equity, offering a striking convergence with the theory of sovereignty advanced in my Sovereigns as Trustees of Humanity (2013). This essay examines the relationship between the two. It argues that the Opinion supports the earlier theory in several important respectsrejecting purely domestic conceptions of sovereign responsibility, affirming sovereignty's embedment in a broader normative order, and requiring other-regarding conduct-while also developing it in ways unforeseen by the earlier account. The essay also argues that the trusteeship framework resolves a question the Opinion leaves open: when do States' obligations with respect to greenhouse gas emissions arise? Finally, the essay reflects on the Opinion's possible significance for the evolving grammar of sovereignty in light of contemporary geopolitical challenges.

Hersch Lauterpacht Memorial Lectures 2026

On June 8-10, 2026, Dapo Akande (Univ. of Oxford - Law) will deliver the 2026 Hersch Lauterpacht Memorial Lectures. The topic is: "Immunities of State Officials and Prosecutions for International Crimes - Where does the Law Stand?" Details are here.

Jones: The Invention of the Continental Shelf: Foreshores and Minerals under the Sea around Cornwall [1854] – an Arbitration between The Crown and The Duchy of Cornwall

Henry Jones (Univ. of Durham - Law) has posted The Invention of the Continental Shelf: Foreshores and Minerals under the Sea around Cornwall [1854] – an Arbitration between The Crown and The Duchy of Cornwall (British Yearbook of International Law, forthcoming) Here's the abstract:
The extension of coastal state sovereign rights over the sea and seabed up to 200 nautical miles was a seismic change in global order. It nearly doubled the amount of the globe subject to state sovereignty, an equivalent change in geopolitics to that of European colonialism. This article searches for the origin of this fundamental change, going back to the first international lawyers to write about the continental shelf, and following where they found historical precedent. I find the origin of the continental shelf in a mid-19th century dispute between the British Crown and the Duchy of Cornwall, over tin mines in that county. In this dispute the legal arguments and conceptual innovations needed for the continental shelf are invented. These innovations allowed for the extension of territory and sovereignty out to sea for the first time in a way which is familiar today. The invention of the continental shelf required nothing less than to fundamentally change how territory and sovereignty are understood.

Perez-Leon-Acevedo & Yepez: The Institutional Pillars of the Latin American Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Human Rights-Based Approach to Health

Juan-Pablo Perez-Leon-Acevedo & Jose Yepez have published The Institutional Pillars of the Latin American Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Human Rights-Based Approach to Health (UCLA Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs, Vol. 29, no. 2, 2026). Here's the abstract:
Latin America has arguably been the most affected region by the COVID-19 pandemic, yet there is no academic article or academic publication on institutional regional responses to the pandemic concerning the right to health. Hence, this article aims to fill that scholarship gap by answering the following question: how have regional bodies responded to COVID-19 concerning the right to health in Latin America? It is overall argued and found herein that: (1) there is a regional system on the right to health in pandemics such as COVID-19, about which a human rights-based approach provides a unifying standard; and (2) this system is embedded within the Organization of American States’ three-pillar framework, consisting of the Pan-American Health Organization, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. A human rights-based approach to health, which relies on international human rights law on the right to health, is considered a key component of the conceptual general framework herein. The Article analyzes the COVID-19 related practices of the three above-mentioned bodies. A central part of this Article’s methodology utilizes findings of convergences, synergies, and divergences between those bodies regarding the right to health during pandemics like COVID-19.

Monday, May 11, 2026

Call for Papers: Mapping International Law’s Second Worlds: Middle Powers, Semi-Peripheries and Shifting Hierarchies in the Global Legal Order

A call for papers has been issued for the second Second World Approaches to International Law conference, to take place November 16-17, 2026, at the Yong Pung How School of Law, Singapore Management University. The theme is: "Mapping International Law’s Second Worlds: Middle Powers, Semi-Peripheries and Shifting Hierarchies in the Global Legal Order." The call is here.

Conference: A Commitment to Global Multilateralism? Canada in the International Arena during the Trudeau Era (2015–2025)

On May 18–19, 2026, a conference on "A Commitment to Global Multilateralism? Canada in the International Arena during the Trudeau Era (2015–2025)" will be held at the University of Messina. Details are here.

Call for Papers: 2026 ASIL Research Forum

The American Society of International Law has issued a call for papers for its 2026 Research Forum, a part of the Society's Midyear Meeting, which will be held November 5-7, at Santa Clara University School of Law. The deadline is June 5, 2026, at 5:00pm EDT. The call is here.

Dothan: The Way to Hell: When International Law Violations Spiral Out of Control

Shai Dothan (Univ. of Copenhagen - Law) has posted The Way to Hell: When International Law Violations Spiral Out of Control (Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law, forthcoming). Here's the abstract:
Severe violations of international law tend to spread from one country to another. No country would like to be left behind while its enemies or neighbors gain an advantage through violating international law. This paper investigates three case studies of extreme cascades into blatant international law violations: the growing practice of bombing cities during the Second World War, the spreading of the practice of torture after the terrorist attack on 9/11, and the expansion of the practice of targeted killings in recent years. The goal of these case studies is to illustrate the mechanisms that make a cascade towards increasing violations of international law likely to happen. By understanding these mechanisms, it is possible to think about how such harmful cascades can be slowed down, stopped, or even reversed.

Sunday, May 10, 2026

New Issue: Chinese Journal of International Law

The latest issue of the Chinese Journal of International Law (Vol. 25, no. 1, March 2026) is out. Contents include:
  • Editorial Comments in Honor of the United Nations at 80 and the Bandung Conference at 70 (Part I)
    • Zhenmin LIU, United Nations to Be Reformed, Not Replaced: Toward a Better Shared Future for Humanity
    • Xinxiang Shi & Zhengqian Li, The Role of the United Nations in the Maintenance of International Peace and Security
    • Yang Liu, United Nations and Human Rights: A Brief Reflection
    • Wei Shen, United Nations and Development
    • Jinyuan Su, United Nations and Global Commons Governance
  • Articles
    • Lingjie Kong & Yanling Liu, Australia’s Obligations for the Acquisition and Operation of Nuclear Submarines under AUKUS: What Can Article 14 of its Comprehensive Safeguards Agreement with the IAEA Tell us?
    • Dennis J Baker, From Regulation to Crime Control: Preventive Justice in the Governance of Global Markets
  • Letters to the Journal
    • Marco Longobardo, The Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights in Armed Conflict in the DRC v. Rwanda Case in the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights
    • Xiaolin LI & Guangjian TU, Agudas Chasidei Chabad of U.S. v. Russian Federation: Reaffirming the Narrow Reach of the FSIA Expropriation Exception against Foreign States

New Issue: Journal of the History of International Law / Revue d'histoire du droit international

The latest issue of the Journal of the History of International Law / Revue d'histoire du droit international (Vol. 28, no. 1, 2026) is out. Contents include:
  • Rémi Fuhrmann, Localising Civil Wars: International Law, the Spanish Civil War, and the Institutionalisation of ‘Non-Intervention’
  • Eleni Ilia, On Creating a Space Power: The United States, International Law, and the Shaping of Outer Space in the 1950s and 1960s
  • Julian Lubini, The Beginnings of International Nature Conservation Law with the Svalbard (Spitsbergen) Treaty of 1920: A Transnational Initiative of European Natural and Legal Scientists

Saturday, May 9, 2026

Conference: 2026 ASIL Abroad

On July 6-7, 2026, the American Society of International Law will host its third ASIL Abroad at Torcuato Di Tella University, Buenos Aires. The theme is: "The International Legal Order at a Crossroads: Rupture, Resilience, and Renewal." Registration and details are here.

Thursday, May 7, 2026

New Issue: International Legal Materials

The latest issue of International Legal Materials (Vol. 65, no. 2, April 2026) is out. Contents include:
  • Land and Maritime Delimitation and Sovereignty Over Islands (Gabon/Eq. Guinea) (I.C.J.), with introductory note by Gleider Hernández
  • The Agreement Between the Council of Eur. and Ukr. on the Establishment of the Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression Against Ukr. and the Statute of the Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression Against Ukr., with introductory note by David M. Crane
  • Regulation 2024/1348/EU Establishing a Common Procedure for Int’l Protection in the Union and Repealing Directive 2013/32/EU (E.U.), with introductory note by Vasiliki Apatzidou

Event: Litigating Genocides

On May 18, 2026, a speech and panel discussion will be held on "Litigating Genocides," in Venice and on streaming. Details are here.

Wednesday, May 6, 2026

New Issue: La Comunità Internazionale

The latest issue of La Comunità Internazionale (Vol. 81, no. 1, 2026) is out. Contents include:
  • Interventi
    • Gianpaolo Maria Ruotolo, Su taluni profili del rapporto tra guerra e disinformazione nel diritto internazionale
  • Articoli e Saggi
    • Agostina Latino, Deadly Rhythms: The Sonic Dimension of Incitement to Genocide in International Law
    • Rita Mazza, Sea-level rise e continuità dello Stato nel parere della Corte internazionale di giustizia sul cambiamento climatico: questioni aperte
    • Alan Amadio, Il crimine “eccezionale”: recenti sviluppi in tema di criminalizzazione dell’aggressione
    • Miriam Schettini, Is It Time to Reconsider the Creation of an African Criminal Court? Some Reflections Following Angola’s Recent Ratification of the Malabo Protocol
  • Osservatorio Europeo
    • Giuseppet Emanuele Corsaro, Un’iniziativa team Europe? Il Piano Mattei, la solidarietà internazionale e le sfide della nuova politica italiana di cooperazione allo sviluppo nel Mediterraneo
  • Osservatorio Diritti Umani
    • Francesco Viggiani, Guerra e soggetti “invisibili”: la condizione degli anziani nella Striscia di Gaza tra diritto internazionale e ordini di evacuazione
  • Note e Commenti
    • Claudio Di Turi, Il secondo Vertice mondiale per lo sviluppo sociale: esiti, criticità e prospettive future
    • Andrea D'Orrio, La corsa all’Artico: la prospettiva geopolitica russa

Tuesday, May 5, 2026

Call for Papers: Athens International Young Scholars Conference on Space Law

A call for papers has been issued for the 2026 Athens International Young Scholars Conference on Space Law, which will take place September 11-12, 2026, at the Law School of the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens. The theme is: "Weaponising the Final Frontier: Outer Space Militarisation and the Legal Boundaries of Jus ad Bellum and Jus in Bello." The call is here.

Monday, May 4, 2026

Conference: International Law in Transformation: Global Challenges, Sustainability, and Legal Innovation

On June 5, 2026, the third meeting on Current Issues and Challenges in International Law will take place at Lusófona University, in Porto. The theme is: “International Law in Transformation: Global Challenges, Sustainability, and Legal Innovation.” Details are here.

Sunday, May 3, 2026

Call for Papers: 55th Annual Conference of the Canadian Council on International Law

The Canadian Council on International Law has issued a call for papers for its 55th Annual Conference, which will take place October 29-30, 2026, in Ottawa. The theme is "Bend, Not Break: Resilience and Evolution of International Law." The call is here.

Saturday, May 2, 2026

New Issue: World Trade Review

The latest issue of the World Trade Review (Vol. 25, no. 2, May 2026) is out. Contents include:
  • Hao-Zhe He, Gen-Fu Feng, & Chun-Ping Chang, The Impact of ESG Gaps on Green Exports in Bilateral Trade: A Linear and Nonlinear Analysis
  • Romus Noufelie & Boris Landry Djamen, Global Value Chain Integration, Quality of Institutions and Multidimensional Energy Poverty in African Countries
  • Axel Berger, Ali Dadkhah, Florian Gitt, Zoryana Olekseyuk, & Jakob Schwab, The Investment Facilitation Index (IFI): Quantifying Domestic Investment Facilitation Frameworks
  • Leopoldo Biffi & Christian Winkler, Tightening or Loosening? The Effects of Uncertainty on the Design of Preferential Trade Agreements
  • Niels Lachmann, Technical Dialogue or Political Statements? Members’ Concerns about Digital Trade at WTO Committees and Councils
  • Sunayana Sasmal, Let’s Get Critical: Critical Minerals Mini Deals as Evolving Models of Trade Cooperation

Friday, May 1, 2026

Call for Papers: Asian Cities and the International Legal Order 2.0: Urban Challenges and International Law in Asia

A call for papers has been issued for the SMU-Max Planck Workshop "Asian Cities and the International Legal Order 2.0: Urban Challenges and International Law in Asia," which will take place November 2-3, 2026, at the Yong Pung How School of Law, Singapore Management University. The call is here.

Thursday, April 30, 2026

New Issue: Human Rights Quarterly

The latest issue of the Human Rights Quarterly (Vol. 48, no. 2, May 2026) is out. Contents include:
  • Paul Hunt, Empowering Human Rights for Revolutionary Change
  • Jennifer Bates, Beyond Territorialization? State Constructions of the Indigenous Subject of Rights in Multicultural Colombia
  • Omar G. Encarnación, Confronting Historical Injustices: The Politics of Gay Reparations
  • Aleydis Nissen, The Right to Access Sport for All in Europe
  • Jeremy Julian Sarkin & Benjamin Dugdale, How Selective Interventionism Trumps Human Rights Protection: A Configurational Analysis of the United Nations Security Council’s Disparate Response to Genocide
  • Katarzyna Sękowska-Kozłowska & Katarzyna Ważyńska-Finck, Vulnerable and Empowered? Girls in the Practice of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women and the Committee on the Rights of the Child

Webinar: Global Health Law and Governance Between Progress and Challenges

On May 5, 2026, a third webinar will be held in the ESIL Conversations series “Multilateralism in Times of Unilateralism.” The topic is: “Global Health Law and Governance Between Progress and Challenges.” Details are here.

Wednesday, April 29, 2026

Sayapin: A Central Asian Perspective on International Law

Sergey Sayapin
(KIMEP Univ​. - Law) has published A Central Asian Perspective on International Law (Hart Publishing 2026). Here's the abstract:

This book offers the first full-length, systematic account of international law as seen and applied from the perspective of Central Asia.

Since gaining independence from the Soviet Union in 1991, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan have gradually emerged as active participants in the international legal order. Drawing on their evolving statehood and regional cooperation, this book explores how the Central Asian States engage with the rules, principles, and institutions of international law.

Across 15 chapters, the book covers key areas of international law – from the nature and sources of international law to the law of treaties, international responsibility, and peaceful settlement of disputes – as well as specialist regimes including international human rights, humanitarian and criminal law, international peace and security, and international trade law. Dedicated chapters address the status of the Caspian Sea, the role of international organisations and non-State actors, and the domestic implementation of international norms.

Through rigorous legal analysis and rich empirical references, the book also examines Central Asian constitutional and policy approaches to international law, regional mechanisms of dispute settlement, and case studies such as the legal status of the Caspian Sea, the Central Asian Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone, and the development of institutional arbitration in the region, including the Astana International Financial Centre and the Tashkent International Arbitration Centre. The analysis highlights how the region's engagement with international law reflects both adaptation to global norms and the emergence of context-specific legal practices.

Tuesday, April 28, 2026

Douglas: The Criminal State: War, Atrocity, and the Dream of International Justice

Lawrence Douglas
(Amherst College) has published The Criminal State: War, Atrocity, and the Dream of International Justice (Princeton Univ. Press 2026). Here's the abstract:

The Criminal State offers a gripping account of how law has confronted the most radical forms of state violence. Beautifully written, broad in scope, and bracingly original, it weaves history with political thought to trace the shifting legal response to state aggression and atrocities, from Leopold’s rule over the Congo to Putin’s war in Ukraine.

At its heart is Lawrence Douglas’s fresh interpretation of the law’s reckoning with Nazi aggression and atrocity. He shows how the Nuremberg trials challenged centuries of thought—rooted in Hobbes and other canonical thinkers—that shielded sovereigns from legal scrutiny. Yet Nuremberg’s bid to frame aggression as the cornerstone of a new order of international criminal law largely failed, giving way to a system now centrally concerned with crimes against humanity and genocide—while leaving unresolved the legality and effectiveness of using force to stop the worst violations of human rights.

Providing rare historical perspective on the dilemmas facing international courts, The Criminal State is a sweeping, provocative history of the struggle to bring perpetrators of state violence to justice.

Monday, April 27, 2026

Workshop: International Law and the Strategic Use of Economic Coercion

On May 5, 2026, Bocconi University will host a workshop on "International Law and the Strategic Use of Economic Coercion." The event will also be accessible online. Details are here.

New Issue: Chicago Journal of International Law

The latest issue of the Chicago Journal of International Law (Vol. 26, no. 2, Winter 2026) is out. Contents include:
  • Rangita de Silva de Alwis, "Because We Take Our Values to War": Analyzing the Views of UN Member States on AI-Driven Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems
  • Shai Dothan, The Seeds of Peace and Justice
  • Aaron X. Fellmeth, The Territorial Independence of Intellectual Property Rights
  • Peter J. Spiro, Balancing Nationalities in International Investment Law

Sunday, April 26, 2026

Cimiotta: Ukraine peace treaty, territorial concessions, and international law

Emanuele Cimiotta (Università degli Studi di Perugia) has posted Ukraine peace treaty, territorial concessions, and international law (Journal of Conflict and Security Law, forthcoming). Here's the abstract:
Shortly after, in January 2025, the new US administration took office, and Ukraine peace talks began. To end the war that Russia started more than three years ago, a peace deal is not a utopia anymore. Ukraine has consistently made clear that no negotiations are possible until its territorial integrity is fully restored. In contrast, Russia has repeatedly stated that talks are only possible based on the ‘new realities’ on the ground. To date, lawyers have debated the question of whether international law permits aggressor States to retain territorial gains under a peace treaty. This article investigates the legal position of Ukraine. It discusses whether international law permits attacked States to give up territory as a last resort measure to reach a viable peace deal. More specifically, it explores the extent to which international law restrains Ukrainian consent to territorial concessions. As under the circumstances of the ongoing Russian invasion of Ukraine, the legality of land transfers pursuant to the law of state responsibility and the law of treaties is controversial, and its assessment overlooks the manifold interests at stake, this article suggests reframing the matter in terms of a conflict between two jus cogens norms. On the one hand, the prohibition of aggression, assuming that it goes as far as forbidding territorial concessions that would indirectly condone forceful territorial acquisitions. On the other hand, the right of self-determination, assuming that it grants the Ukrainian people the absolute right to freely determine their territorial status in a peace treaty. Thus, the issue arises of how to solve this conflict. Apparently, positive international law lacks a ready-to-use rule to do so. However, the principles of proportionality and of peaceful dispute settlement may guide the process. They require a complex interpretative activity, in light of a number of criteria, to craft a treaty that could balance both norms. The goal is to preserve each norm as much as possible and ensure lasting peace.

New Issue: International Criminal Law Review

The latest issue of the International Criminal Law Review (Vol. 26, no. 2, 2026) is out. Contents include:
  • Mark Klamberg, War Crimes Trials Before Domestic Courts in Ukraine – Making the Case for a Differentiated Approach to International Law
  • Roman Tashian, Nataliia Smetanina, Ilona Konovalova, Sergiy Kharytonov, & Oleksii V. Tavolzhanskyi, Implementation of International Anti-Corruption Standards into Ukrainian Legislation
  • Achmad Irwan Hamzani, Sami’an Sami’an, & Nur Khasanah, Restorative Justice and Legal Pluralism in Indonesia: Implications for Atrocity Crimes and Global Criminal Justice Reform
  • Ligeia Quackelbeen, Rethinking Treaty Interpretation and Crime Interpretation at the ICC
  • Karolina Nabożna & Klaus Bachmann, Taking Stock of Syria’s Approach to Transitional Justice

Thursday, April 23, 2026

New Issue: American Journal of International Law

The latest issue of the American Journal of International Law (Vol. 120, no. 2, April 2026) is out. Contents include:
  • Article
    • Jason Yackee, Legal Entrepreneurship and the Invention of Legal Meaning: Revisiting Lord Asquith’s Abu Dhabi Award
  • Current Development
    • Aldo Zammit Borda, Stefan Mandelbaum, & Andrea Maria Pelliconi, The ILC Study on Teachings as Subsidiary Means: Arguments for a Pluralist Reading
  • In Memoriam
    • Adrien Wing, In Memoriam Henry J. Richardson III (1941–2025)
  • International Decisions
    • John H. Knox, Obligations of States in Respect of Climate Change, Advisory Opinion
    • Riccardo Di Marco, Case of The J. Paul Getty Trust and Others v. Italy, Judgment
    • Fabian Eichberger, Angel Samuel Seda and Others v. The Republic of Colombia, Award
    • Yury Rovnov, European Union and Certain Member States — Certain Measures Concerning Palm Oil and Oil Palm Crop-Based Biofuels (Malaysia); European Union — Certain Measures Concerning Palm Oil and Oil Palm Crop-Based Biofuels (Indonesia), Panel Report
    • Arman Sarvarian, Land and Maritime Delimitation and Sovereignty Over Islands (Gabon v. Equatorial Guinea), Judgment
  • Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law
    • The Security Council Adopts Resolution Endorsing the United States’ “Comprehensive Plan to End the Gaza Conflict”
    • The United States Withdraws Its Participation in the Human Rights Council’s Universal Periodic Review
    • The United States Attacks Venezuela and Abducts President Nicolás Maduro
    • President Trump Instructs the Department of War to Start Testing Nuclear Weapons
    • President Trump Issues Executive Order Providing Qatar with a U.S. Security Guarantee
  • Recent Books on International Law
    • Christian Tams, reviewing A “Constitution for the Oceans”: The Long Hard Road to the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, by Kirsten Sellars
    • Kristina Daugirdas, reviewing Ways of Seeing International Organisations: New Perspectives for International Institutional Law, edited by Negar Mansouri and Daniel R. Quiroga-Villamarín
    • Afroditi Giovanopoulou, reviewing The New Haven School: American International Law, by Ríán Derrig
    • Rachel Brewster, reviewing Industrial Policy, National Security, and the Perilous Plight of the WTO, by Petros C. Mavroidis

Tuesday, April 21, 2026

Call for Papers: IHL Beyond States: New Patterns, New Spaces, and New Actors in Armed Conflicts

A call for papers has been issued for a conference on "IHL Beyond States: New Patterns, New Spaces, and New Actors in Armed Conflicts," to take place October 16, 2026, at the University of Belgrade Faculty of Political Science. Topics include: The Globalization of Non-International Armed Conflicts; Civilian Protection at the Breaking Point; New Spaces of Conflict: From Cyberspace to the Global Commons; and New Actors in Armed Conflicts. Marco Sassòli (Univ. of Geneva) will deliver a keynote. The call is here.

Monday, April 20, 2026

New Issue: Business and Human Rights Journal

The latest issue of the Business and Human Rights Journal (Vol. 11, no. 1, February 2026) is out. Contents include:
  • Articles
    • Etienne Roy Grégoire, Marc-André Anzueto, Bonnie Campbell, Mélisande Séguin, Nancy R. Tapias Torrado, & Karen Hamilton, ‘Do-it-Yourself FPIC’: The Political Grammar of Canada’s Normative Entrepreneurship in the Global Extractive Sector
    • Leonard Feld, Leading the Way or Crossing the Line? The Extraterritorial Dimension of the EU Directive on Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence
    • Eva Nave, Criminal Hate Speech Attributable to Online Platforms: A Call for a Thorough Corporate Remedial Responsibilities Framework in Europe
    • Naphtali Ukamwa, Towards a Definition of a Sustainable Corporation Under the International Frameworks on Business and Human Rights
  • Developments in the Field Symposium; Business and Human Rights and the arms industry: challenges, prospects, and current dynamics
    • Valentina Azarova, León Castellanos-Jankiewicz, Tomas Hamilton, Cannelle Lavite, & Chloe Bailey, Corporate Accountability in the Arms Sector: Possibilities, Limits, and Visions of Justice
    • Shahd Hammouri, Reckoning With the Paradox of Regulating the Arms Industry: The Context of Palestine
    • Lana Baydas, Human Rights Due Diligence Within the Arms Industry: Challenges, Practices and Opportunities
    • Marina Aksenova, The Arms Industry and International Criminal Liability: Challenging the Status Quo?
    • Michael Marchant & Zenkosi Mathe, ‘Offshoring’ Weapons Production and Implications for Export Controls: Lessons from South Africa
    • Hiruni Alwishewa, Addressing the Human Rights Risks of Financing the Arms Industry: Insights from Banks’ Corporate Policies
    • Emma Baldi, Arms Exports and the Right to Life: The RWM Italia Case
    • Cynthia L. Ebbs, Advancing the Humanitarian Imperative of the Arms Trade Treaty: Public and Private Sector Engagement in Responsible Arms Transfers
    • Antonio Guzmán Mutis, Corporate Duties of the Arms Industry at the Inter-American Court of Human Rights: A Tale of Risk and Attribution
    • Julie Février & Sarra Dajean, Corporate Complicity in International Crimes: Implications of the Lafarge Jurisprudence for the Arms Industry

Sunday, April 19, 2026

Webinar: Toward a Treaty on Protection of Persons in the Event of Disasters

On April 22, 2026, a second webinar will be held in the ESIL Conversations series “Multilateralism in Times of Unilateralism.” The topic is: “Towards a Treaty on Protection of Persons in the Event of Disasters.” Details are here.

New Issue: Global Responsibility to Protect

The latest issue of Global Responsibility to Protect (Vol. 18, nos. 1-2, 2026) is out. Contents include:
  • Articles
    • Md Syful Islam, Were Crimes Against Humanity Committed During the July 2024 Crackdown on Student Protests in Bangladesh? A Legal Analysis
    • Havva Yeşil, The Compatibility of the EU-Turkey Statement with EU Law and International Human Rights Law
    • Jan Hornat, Aporia and Responsibilisation in the Liberal International Order
  • Intervention
    • Helder Ferreira do Vale, The Venezuelan Crisis: From Multilateral R2P to US Unilateral Control

Saturday, April 18, 2026

New Issue: The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals

The latest issue of The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals (Vol. 24, no. 2, 2025) is out. Contents include:
  • Niccolò Lanzoni, The International Judicial Function and How We Think About It: Non Liquet, Revisited
  • Zhifeng Jiang, Negotiation as a Precondition for Seizing the International Court of Justice
  • Antoine De Spiegeleir, Consecutive Provisional Measures Requests at the World Court: More of the Same?
  • Bruno Simma, When “Community Interest” Intervenes: Article 62 of the ICJ Statute Facing Obligations erga omnes (partes)
  • Nasim Zargarinejad, Shadowing Adversarial Proceedings? The ICJ’s Lesser-Known Discretion in Advisory Procedure
  • Miłosz Gapsa, Clarifying the Unclear: Requests for Modification, Revocation, and New Provisional Measures

Nakajima & Kato: The Governing Law of Unlawfully Issued Sovereign Debt

Kei Nakajima (Univ. of Tokyo - Law) & Shiho Kato (Univ. of Tokyo - Law) have published The Governing Law of Unlawfully Issued Sovereign Debt (Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business, Vol. 46, no. 1, p. 39, 2026). Here's the abstract:
In October 2019, Petróleos de Venezuela, S.A. (PDVSA), a Venezuelan state owned oil and natural gas company, filed a complaint against the trustee and the collateral agent of PDVSA’s bondholders, alleging that certain bonds due in 2020 issued in exchange for the defaulted bonds due in 2017 are null and void ab initio. The main cause of action was that the 2020 bonds had been issued in violation of the provisions of the Venezuelan Constitution. This contention was advanced notwithstanding that the 2020 bonds provide that “all matters arising out of or relating in any whatsoever” to the instruments shall be governed by the law of New York. At the same time, New York’s conflict-of-laws statute contains a rule providing that “[t]he local law of the issuer’s jurisdiction … governs … the validity of a security,” which was discovered and invoked by the (sub-)sovereign debtor as a relatively uncommon ground for the repudiation of its external debt. The federal district court dismissed the plaintiffs’ contention by adopting a narrow reading of the term “validity” within the meaning of New York’s conflict of-laws rule, whereas the Court of Appeals of New York State showed an opposite but nuanced interpretation by concluding that Venezuelan law does govern the validity of the PDVSA’s bonds, but with the repeated caveats that the consequences of eventual invalidity remain to be governed by New York law. The present article examines the governing law of sovereign debt issued allegedly in contravention of the sovereign debtor’s constitutional and budgetary constraints, with special reference to the case brought by PDVSA before New York courts. It aims to identify the role of private international law as a device for global governance by which the application of a sovereign’s budgetary disciplines is ensured to serve the public policy objectives of sovereign debt sustainability.

Subedi: Interlinkages between human rights, climate action and due diligence obligations of states: Potential impact on business organizations

Surya P. Subedi (Univ. of Leeds - Law) has published Interlinkages between human rights, climate action and due diligence obligations of states: Potential impact on business organizations (Environmental Policy and Law, Vol. 55, no. 6, 2025). Here's the abstract:
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) in its landmark Advisory Opinion of 23 July 2025, has established a clear connection between human rights, climate action and due diligence obligations of States under treaty and customary international law. The Court appears to have elevated the concept of due diligence from a relatively soft principle to a powerful standard, against which to assess compliance of international obligations by states. In their turn, States are likely to pass on these obligations to business organisations too through various human rights and environmental due diligence schemes. There are various reporting requirements of the European Union for business organisations through several schemes that already point to a move in this direction. Thus, the impact of this ICJ Advisory Opinion is not limited to States per se. It has the potential to require business organisations to adhere to an international human rights and environmental due diligence standard, against which their own policies and practices can be evaluated. The paper seeks to examine this perspective.

Wednesday, April 15, 2026

Burgers, Kooijman, Pantazopoulos, & Paulussen: Ecocide: Criminalising Serious Harm against the Environment

Laura Burgers
(Univ. of Amsterdam - Law), Merle Kooijman (Univ. of Amsterdam - Law), Stavros Evdokimos Pantazopoulos (National and Kapodistrian Univ. of Athens – Law), & Christophe Paulussen (T.M.C. Asser Institute) have published Ecocide: Criminalising Serious Harm against the Environment (Asser Press 2026). Here’s the abstract:

Ecocide: Criminalising Serious Harm against the Environment explores the concept of ecocide and critically assesses how the criminalisation of serious harm against the environment fits within international criminal law broadly construed. It aims to assist in fleshing out crucial parameters in the lead-up to the potential inclusion of the fifth core international crime in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC), as well as in relation to efforts to criminalise ecocide at the national level, both of which have gained unprecedented momentum in recent times.

To this end, the volume’s chapters address four key questions: what constitutes ecocide, how can it be prosecuted, where should it be prosecuted, and who are its perpetrators and victims? In addition to more practice-focused chapters, including case studies on the Netherlands and Ukraine, the book analyses and challenges fundamental conceptual issues, including the binary opposition between ‘anthropocentrism’ and ‘ecocentrism’ in the ecocide discourse. The reader is confronted with and forced to reflect on intriguing questions such as: is it fair to only prosecute representatives of large business corporations and state officials, while letting consumers of polluting products off the hook? And does the legal framework of the ICC allow for the recognition of nonhumans, such as the environment, as victims of ecocide?

New Issue: Swiss Review of International and European Law

The latest issue of the Swiss Review of International and European Law (2026, no. 1) is out. Contents include:
  • Robert Kolb, L’interdiction de livraison « indirecte » d’armes à un belligérant par un Etat neutre
  • Denise Wohlwend, Beyond Territory – Jurisdictional and Legitimacy Reflections on the EU CSRD and CSDDD

Tuesday, April 14, 2026

New Issue: Yale Journal of International Law

The latest issue of the Yale Journal of International Law (Vol. 51, no. 1, 2026) is out. Contents include:
  • Eliav Lieblich, The Death and Life of the Prohibition on Forcible Reprisals
  • Monica Hakimi, Thinking Constructively About International Law
  • Abadir M. Ibrahim & Angela Hefti, Contributions of the African Human Rights System to International Climate Law

New Issue: Military Law and the Law of War Review / Revue de Droit Militaire et de Droit de la Guerre

The latest issue of the Military Law and the Law of War Review / Revue de Droit Militaire et de Droit de la Guerre (Vol. 63, no. 2, 2025) is out. Contents include:
  • Joop Voetelink, Export control and international law
  • Liron A. Libman & Amichai Cohen, Why do we enforce the law against IHL violations? Reason-giving in Israeli court-martial judgments
  • Winthrop Wells, Military information as evidence of the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant’s crimes
  • Maxime Nijs, The invisible battlefield: applying the rules of international humanitarian law on the conduct of hostilities to jamming and spoofing operations

New Issue: Review of International Organizations

The latest issue of the Review of International Organizations (Vol. 21, no. 1, March 2026) is out. Contents include:
  • Special Issue: Domestic politics and international organizations
    • T. Renee Bowen, J. Lawrence Broz, & Christina J. Schneider, Domestic politics and international organizations
    • Tom Hunter & Stefanie Walter, International organizations in national parliamentary debates
    • Bernd Schlipphak, Constantin Schäfer, & Oliver Treib, Cosmopolitan identity, authority, and domestic support of international organizations
    • Haillie Na-Kyung Lee & Jong Hyun Lee, Why settle?: Partisan-based explanation of investor-state dispute outcomes
    • Jennifer L. Tobin, Beyond investment flows: How perceptions of property rights drive the impact of IIAs
    • Michael-David Mangini, How effective is trade conditionality? Economic coercion in the Generalized System of Preferences
    • Rachel J. Schoner, Naming and shaming in UN treaty bodies: Individual petitions’ effect on human rights
    • Arianna Bondi, Leonardo Baccini, Matteo Fiorini, Bernard Hoekman, Carlo Altomonte & Italo Colantone , Global value chains and the design of trade agreements