EGSTradeHub.org is a new one-stop resource bringing together academic research, legal materials, policy documents, institutional resources, events, reports, and commentary relating broadly to Environmental Goods and Services (EGS), trade and environment, and climate-aligned trade governance. Developed by Dr Nicolette Butler (University of Manchester) and Dr Jasem Tarawneh (Queen Mary University of London), the platform is designed to help users navigate what is often a fragmented and difficult-to-access landscape by consolidating a wide range of materials into a single, searchable, and regularly updated resource.
The Hub serves as a key resource for academics, students, policymakers, negotiators, practitioners, NGOs, and others working across international trade, environmental governance, and sustainable development. The project team also warmly welcomes suggestions and contributions of relevant publications, reports, events, databases, and other materials to help ensure the resource remains comprehensive and up to date. The website is available here.
Friday, May 22, 2026
Research Platform: EGSTradeHub.org
Thursday, July 2, 2020
Call for Headnotes: International Institutional Practice Regarding the COVID-19 Pandemic
International organizations have been actively involved in fighting the COVID-19 pandemic, covering issues ranging from governance in the health sector to the sovereign debt payment obligations of countries whose economy has been significantly affected. These actions are producing a rich collection of documents of international organizations. In actively addressing the challenges, the documents have stirred up debates and critiques that are of particular relevance to the law and practice of international organizations. OXIO is seeking to publish new headnotes regarding such new and current institutional practice (including but not limited to that of the World Health Organization) relating to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Oxford International Organizations (OXIO) is a database of annotated documents pertaining to the law of international organizations. The database is a unique and important repository, and the first of its kind, for acts and practices of international organizations which are of central importance to enquiries into international law, including international institutional law, and which have never been consolidated in one single tool. Learn more about the database on the About OXIO page.
Replies to the call should be addressed to oxio.editors@gmail.com and n.rusli@rug.nl.
Wednesday, October 23, 2019
New Website: GPIL – German Practice in International Law
GPIL – German Practice in International Law publishes case studies on German State practice in the field of public international law. Each case study presents the German position on a particular question of public international law and puts that position in its wider factual and political context. Where applicable, it also records the reactions of other States and provides a legal assessment of the German position. Case studies are based on decisions by German courts, diplomatic notes, official government statements, answers to parliamentary questions, government reports, or statement before international organizations. All documents or extracts thereof not otherwise available in English are translated into English. In this manner it hopes to provide non-German speaking scholars and practitioners with a ready source of current information on the views and practice of the Government of the Federal Republic of Germany in the field of public international law.
GPIL covers the full spectrum of public international law ranging from air and space law to the use of force. The material is arranged in 35 broad subject categories. A Search facility allows for a full-text search of all records. The material is presented without hyperlinks or references as many of the original documents will be in German. A fully referenced version of all entries will be published annually in book form.
If you are interested in State practice, please check out GPIL and subscribe to the newsletter.
Thursday, October 26, 2017
Oxford International Organizations
International organizations have been with us for a long time. They are now cardinal actors in international life, law and politics, a critical role which was probably not fully anticipated at their inception in the mid-nineteenth century.
It is frequently acknowledged that, especially since the creation of the United Nations in 1945, the role of organizations has increased exponentially. Today over 600 international intergovernmental organizations are active in virtually all areas of human activity, including (but not at all limited to) environmental protection; peace and security; health; trade; food and agriculture; technology; human rights; rail transport; and space travel. Organizations are platforms for State action, but they also operate as independent actors. Indeed, next to States, organizations are key participants in international legal affairs. In the same vein, many of the resolutions, decisions, statements and drafts produced by international organizations have lasting relevance for the development and interpretation of international law and its main rules. In addition, international organizations and their institutional structure have themselves been elevated into an important object of study and numerous scholarly works on international organizations are produced every year. Issues of international norm-creation, decision-making, and immunity of organizations before domestic courts, to name but a few, continue to be topical and extensively studied.
While there is general agreement on the increasing role played by international organizations, the actual extent of this role and the implications thereof remain the object of intense debate in legal and scholarly commentaries. Indeed, organizations today seem to be simultaneously acclaimed and abhorred; deemed to be the guardian of the international order and the cause of international disorder; taken as the monitors of fundamental rights and the villains of the international rule of law. By the same token, there is a wide range of understandings of what constitutes an ‘international organization’, ranging from an inter-state treaty regime to an autonomous constitutional subject with its own legal order. In this sense, international organizations and their contribution to global governance have perhaps never been as discussed and contested as they are today.
It is in this context that Oxford International Organizations (OXIO) has been built, with the aim of providing practitioners, scholars, legal advisers, policy-makers, and observers of international relations with the most precise, holistic and up-to-date picture of the acts of international organizations possible, and with an increased understanding of the contribution of these organizations. OXIO is the first database for analyzing and understanding key documents of international organizations. Each document is accompanied by a concise expert commentary. In order to capture the full bearing of international organizations on various substantive areas of international law as well as on the field of international institutional law in particular, OXIO includes, but is not limited to, resolutions and decisions of organizations, draft normative texts prepared within the framework of organizations, and constituent instruments of organizations. It also contains court decisions relevant for the institutional law of organizations as well as, occasionally, a treaty to which an organization is a party, where this brings light to issues of institutional law. Until now, there have been no such collection of documents spanning all organizations and areas of international law. OXIO is a unique repository which brings together a variety of documents that have never been consolidated in one single tool – a tool that will be constantly updated with the latest documents and acts of international organizations.
For the sake of OXIO, ‘international organization’ refers to an intergovernmental organization established between states or other international legal actors by a treaty or other instrument possessing at least some permanence of structure. ‘Non-governmental organizations’ (NGOs) are excluded from the scope of OXIO. Yet, OXIO is keen to take into account the fringes of the intergovernmental category so defined. Thus, a document of the G20 (an intergovernmental platform with probably an insufficient degree of permanence to qualify as a traditional ‘international organization’) could be relevant for an OXIO headnote. The same holds for a document pertaining to a ‘public-private partnership’ (where the private party-component would preclude it from qualifying as a traditional ‘international organization’).
The Editors are proud to introduce OXIO to the community of all those who are interested in international organizations, and commend Oxford University Press for facilitating the creation of such an innovative and unprecedented database which will allow practitioners, scholars, legal advisers, policy-makers and observers of international relations and global governance to have at their disposal the most extensive, consolidated and updated database on international organizations and their contribution to international life, law, and politics.
The Editors-in-Chief
Friday, April 15, 2016
New Additions to the UN Audiovisual Library of International Law
Wednesday, April 6, 2016
New Additions to the UN Audiovisual Library of International Law
Thursday, March 24, 2016
New Additions to the UN Audiovisual Library of International Law
Thursday, March 10, 2016
New Additions to the UN Audiovisual Library of International Law
Friday, February 26, 2016
New Additions to the UN Audiovisual Library of International Law
Wednesday, December 23, 2015
New Additions to the UN Audiovisual Library of International Law
Sunday, December 6, 2015
New Additions to the UN Audiovisual Library of International Law
Tuesday, July 21, 2015
New Additions to the UN Audiovisual Library of International Law
Thursday, May 7, 2015
New Additions to the UN Audiovisual Library of International Law
Friday, February 13, 2015
New Additions to the UN Audiovisual Library of International Law
Monday, December 8, 2014
New Additions to the UN Audiovisual Library of International Law
Friday, November 28, 2014
New Additions to the UN Audiovisual Library of International Law
Tuesday, November 11, 2014
New Additions to the UN Audiovisual Library of International Law
Monday, November 3, 2014
New Additions to the UN Audiovisual Library of International Law
Tuesday, November 5, 2013
International Crimes Database
Thursday, November 6, 2008
Website: La compétence universelle en droit belge
La compétence universelle se définit comme la compétence exercée par un Etat qui poursuit les auteurs de certains crimes, quel que soit le lieu où le crime a été commis, et sans égard à la nationalité des auteurs ou des victimes.
Peu d'Etats exercent effectivement cette compétence, même si de nombreuses législations nationales la prévoient. C'est pourquoi la Belgique, qui a adopté en 1993 une loi visant la répression des infractions graves aux Conventions de Genève du 12 août 1949 et aux Protocoles additionnels I et II du 8 juin 1977, plus communément appelée "loi de compétence universelle" et qui l'a mise en oeuvre, a fait office de pionnière. Cette loi a été modifiée à deux reprises, avant d'être abrogée le 5 août 2003. La compétence universelle subsiste toutefois en droit belge. Des dispositions ont été incorporées au Code pénal et au Code de procédure pénale en ce sens. Mais ces dispositions, qui reprennent en partie celles de l'ancienne loi, en restreignent substantiellement la portée.
Le présent dossier documentaire vise à alimenter le débat auquel l'adoption et la mise en oeuvre de cette loi ont donné lieu, en permettant l'accès à un certain nombre de documents de base relatifs à la législation en cause et à ses mises en application devant les tribunaux. Une approche de droit comparé est également proposée, avec des pages consacrées aux développements intervenus dans ce domaine dans deux autres Etats: l’Espagne et la France.
