Does public service liberalization pose a threat to gender and human rights? Traditionally considered essential services provided by a state to its citizens, public services are often viewed as public goods which embody social values. Subjecting them to market ideology thus raises concerns that the intrinsic social nature of these services will be negated. Moreover, as those most likely to be reliant on public services, public service liberalization may also further marginalize women. Nevertheless, states continue to increasingly liberalize public services. Barnali Choudhury explores the implications of public service liberalization. Using primarily a legal approach, but drawing from case studies, empirical research and gender theories, she examines whether liberalization under the General Agreement on Trade in Services and other liberalization vehicles such as preferential trade and investment agreements compromise human rights and gender objectives.
Thursday, November 1, 2012
Choudhury: Public Services and International Trade Liberalization: Human Rights and Gender Implications
Barnali Choudhury (Queen Mary, Univ. of London - Law) has published Public Services and International Trade Liberalization: Human Rights and Gender Implications (Cambridge Univ. Press 2012). Here's the abstract: