This brief paper comments on the clinical isolation and one-sided tendencies in the Philippines’ oral arguments in the South China Sea arbitration, with illustrations from its arguments on (1) negotiation as the agreed exclusive choice for dispute settlement, (2) sovereignty matters, (3) optional exception of delimitation-related disputes; (4) optional exception of military activities disputes; and (5) environmental claims.
Monday, September 28, 2015
Yee: The South China Sea Arbitration: The Clinical Isolation And/Or One-Sided Tendencies in the Philippines’ Oral Arguments
Sienho Yee (Wuhan Univ. - Law) has posted The South China Sea Arbitration: The Clinical Isolation And/Or One-Sided Tendencies in the Philippines’ Oral Arguments (Chinese Journal of International Law, forthcoming). Here's the abstract: