Symposium: Beyond Dispute: International Judicial Institutions as Lawmakers

The latest issue of the German Law Journal (Vol. 12, no. 5, 2011) contains a symposium on "Beyond Dispute: International Judicial Institutions as Lawmakers." Contents include:

• Armin von Bogdandy & Ingo Venzke, Beyond Dispute: International Judicial Institutions as Lawmakers
• Marc Jacobs, Precedents: Lawmaking Through International Adjudication
• Karin Oellers-Frahm, Lawmaking Through Advisory Opinions?
• Eyal Benvenisti & George W. Downs, Prospects for the Increased Independence of International Tribunals
• Stephan W. Schill, System-Building in Investment Treaty Arbitration and Lawmaking
• Ingo Venzke, Making General Exceptions: The Spell of Precedents in Developing Article XX GATT into Standards for Domestic Regulatory Policy
• Thomas Kleinlein, Judicial Lawmaking by Judicial Restraint? The Potential of Balancing in International Economic Law
• Michael Ioannidis, A Procedural Approach to the Legitimacy of International Adjudication: Developing Standards of Participation in WTO Law
• Christina Binder, The Prohibition of Amnesties by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights
• Markus Fyrnys, Expanding Competences by Judicial Lawmaking: The Pilot Judgment Procedure of the European Court of Human Rights
• Milan Kuhli & Klaus Günther, Judicial Lawmaking, Discourse Theory, and the ICTY on Belligerent Reprisals
• Karin Oellers-Frahm, Expanding the Competence to Issue Provisional Measures—Strengthening the International Judicial Function
• Niels Petersen, Lawmaking by the International Court of Justice—Factors of Success
• Lorenzo Casini, The Making of a Lex Sportiva by the Court of Arbitration for Sport
• Armin von Bogdandy & Ingo Venzke, On the Democratic Legitimation of International Judicial Lawmaking