Symposium: International Law and the Constitution: Terms of Engagement

The current issue of the Fordham Law Review (Vol. 77, no. 2, November 2008) contains the proceedings of a symposium on "International Law and the Constitution: Terms of Engagement" that took place a year ago. Contents include:

• Catherine Powell, Introduction
• Martha F. Davis, Upstairs, Downstairs: Subnational Incorporation of International Humans Rights Law at the End of an Era
• Aan Jenkins & Kevin Shawn Hsu, American Ideals & Human Rights: Findings from New Public Opinion Research by the Opportunity Agenda
• Cynthia Soohoo & Suzanne Stolz, Bringing Theories of Human Rights Change Home
• Shayana Kadidal, “Federalizing” Immigration Law: International Law as a Limitation on Congress’s Power to Legislate in the Field of Immigration
• Lenora M. Lapidus, The Role of International Bodies in Influencing U.S. Policy to End Violence Against Women
• Mark R. Shulman, The Four Freedoms: Good Neighbors Make Good Law and Good Policy in a Time of Insecurity
• Harold Hongju Koh, Keynote Address
• Julian Ku, Medellín’s Clear Statement Rule: A Solution for International Delegations
• Janet Koven Levit, Does Medellín Matter?
• Melissa A. Waters, Getting Beyond the Crossfire Phenomenon: A Militant Moderate’s Take on the Role of Foreign Authority in Constitutional Interpretation
• Roger P. Alford, Courts and Constitutional Comparativism
• Ruti Teitel, Humanity-Law: A New Interpretive Lens on the International Sphere