States have often relied on each other’s support to wage wars. But, as military technology advances, contemporary armed conflicts are increasingly characterized by complex patterns of cooperation involving states, international organizations and non-state armed groups. These patterns make it difficult to identify who among the cooperating partners qualifies as a party to conflict – referred to in this research paper as co-parties. But that status has significant legal consequences in the regulation of armed conflict. The need for clarity around co-party status has therefore never been greater.
This research paper aims to provide a roadmap to establish who is party to an armed conflict and the legal implications of that finding. The paper draws on illustrative examples from both recent and current conflicts to analyse what co-party status means and how parties to armed conflicts are identified as a matter of international law.
Saturday, March 30, 2024
Wentker, with Jackson & Hill-Cawthorne: Identifying co-parties to armed conflict in international law: How states, international organizations and armed groups become parties to war
Alexander Wentker (Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law), with Miles Jackson (Univ. of Oxford - Law) & Lawrence Hill-Cawthorne (Univ. of Bristol - Law) have posted Identifying co-parties to armed conflict in international law: How states, international organizations and armed groups become parties to war (Chatham House Research Paper 2024). Here's abstract: