The latest issue of the
Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law (Vol. 32, no. 2, July 2023) is out. Contents include:
-
Special Issue: International Climate Litigation
- Benoit Mayer & Harro van Asselt, The rise of international climate litigation
-
Daniel Bodansky, Advisory opinions on climate change: Some preliminary questions
-
Aref Shams, Tempering great expectations: The legitimacy constraints and the conflict function of international courts in international climate litigation
-
Yoshifumi Tanaka, The role of an advisory opinion of ITLOS in addressing climate change: Some preliminary considerations on jurisdiction and admissibility
-
Rozemarijn J. Roland Holst, Taking the current when it serves: Prospects and challenges for an ITLOS advisory opinion on oceans and climate change
-
Leslie-Anne Duvic-Paoli & Mario Gervasi, Harm to the global commons on trial: The role of the prevention principle in international climate adjudication
-
Christina Voigt, The power of the Paris Agreement in international climate litigation
-
Natalie Jones, Prospects for invoking the law of self-determination in international climate litigation
-
Steve Lorteau, The potential of international ‘State-as-polluter’ litigation
-
Riccardo Luporini & Annalisa Savaresi, International human rights bodies and climate litigation: Don't look up?
-
Armando Rocha & Rômulo Sampaio, Climate change before the European and Inter-American Courts of Human Rights: Comparing possible avenues before human rights bodies
-
Kári Ragnarsson, What can climate change litigation learn from socio-economic rights litigation?
-
Shalini Iyengar, Human rights and climate wrongs: Mapping the landscape of rights-based climate litigation
-
Chiara Tea Antoniazzi, Strengthening the complaint mechanisms of multilateral climate funds and carbon markets: A critical step towards a human rights-based green transition
-
Henok Asmelash, The WTO dispute settlement system as a forum for climate litigation?
-
Diego Mejía-Lemos, The suitability of investor-State dispute settlement and host State counterclaims for implementing climate change international responsibility
-
Ji Ma, Bridging multinational corporations' investment-climate gap: Prospects for the direct claims approach
-
Oliver Hailes, Unjust enrichment in investor–State arbitration: A principled limit on compensation for future income from fossil fuels
- Case Note
- Tadesse M. Kebebew, Dispute over the Status and Use of the Waters of the Silala (Chile v Bolivia): Is the International Court of Justice falling short?
