The latest issue of the
International Review of the Red Cross (Vol. 104, no. 919, April 2022) is out. Contents include:
- Ronald Alcala, Cultural evolution: Protecting “digital cultural property” in armed conflict
-
Katayoun Hosseinnejad & Pouria Askary, The obligation to exercise “leniency” in penal and disciplinary measures against prisoners of war in light of the ICRC updated Commentary on the Third Geneva Convention
-
Ana Beduschi, Harnessing the potential of artificial intelligence for humanitarian action: Opportunities and risks
-
Russell Buchan & Nicholas Tsagourias, Hacking international organizations: The role of privileges, immunities, good faith and the principle of State sovereignty
-
María Camila Correa Flórez, Andrés Felipe Martín Parada, & Juan Francisco Soto Hoyos, Punishment and pardon: The use of international humanitarian law by the Special Jurisdiction for Peace in Colombia
-
Aaron Fellmeth & Emily Crawford, “Reason to know” in the international law of command responsibility
-
Massimo Marelli, The SolarWinds hack: Lessons for international humanitarian organizations
-
Anne Peters & Jérôme de Hemptinne, Animals in war: At the vanishing point of international humanitarian law
-
Elizabeth Salmón & Juan-Pablo Pérez-León-Acevedo, Reparation for victims of serious violations of international humanitarian law: New developments
-
Raphaël van Steenberghe, The impacts of human rights law on the regulation of armed conflict: A coherency-based approach to dealing with both the “interpretation” and “application” processes
-
Ning Wang, Markus Christen, Matthew Hunt, & Nikola Biller-Andorno, Supporting value sensitivity in the humanitarian use of drones through an ethics assessment framework
-
Priscilla Denisse Coria Palomino, A new understanding of disability in international humanitarian law: Reinterpretation of Article 30 of Geneva Convention III
-
Harriet Macey, “Safe zones”: A protective alternative to flight or a tool of refugee containment? Clarifying the international legal framework governing access to refugee protection against the backdrop of “safe zones” in conflict-affected contexts
