The latest issue of
Arbitration International (Vol. 37, no. 3, September 2021) is out. Contents include:
- Articles
-
Franco Ferrari, Plures leges faciunt arbitrum
-
Jacomijn J van Haersolte-van Hof, Impartiality and independence: fundamental and fluid
-
Gaurav Natarajan Ramani, One size doesn’t fit all: the General Data Protection Regulation vis-à-vis international commercial arbitration
-
Rekha Rangachari & Kabir Duggal, Different but similar?: Comparing the IBA Rules on the taking of evidence with the Prague Rules
- Case Notes
-
Aaron Yoong, Of principle, practicality, and precedents: the presumption of the arbitration agreement’s governing law
-
Samuel Yee Ching Leung & Alex Chun Hei Chan, The duties of impartiality, disclosure, and confidentiality: lessons from a London-seated arbitration
- Recent Developments
- Alexander J Marcopoulos, Revisiting the risk of undesired appeal in investment treaty arbitration: is deference to the tribunal’s award still less likely in the ICSID context?
-
Robert Bradshaw, Deception and detection: the use of technology in assessing witness credibility
-
Stefan Pislevik, I now pronounce you ‘null and void’: manner of determination and the applicable law under the New York Convention
-
Mikhail Kalinin & Michael Peer, The lacking interest in interest rates: will the phase-out of LIBOR and negative rates go unnoticed by arbitration practitioners?
-
Andrijana Mišović, Binding non-signatories to arbitrate—the United States approach
