The latest issue of the
Nordic Journal of International Law (Vol. 89, nos. 3-4, 2020) is out. Contents include:
- Special Issue: Proportionality in International Law
-
Eduardo Gill-Pedro & Ulf Linderfalk, Proportionality in International Law: Whose Interests Count?
-
Ségolène Barbou des Places, Revisiting Proportionality in Internal Market Law: Looking at the Unnamed Actors in the cjeu’s Reasoning
-
Darren Harvey, Federal Proportionality Review in EU Law: Whose Rights are they Anyway?
-
Eduardo Gill-Pedro, Proportionality and the Human Rights of Companies Under the ECHR – Whose Interests are at Stake?
-
Daria Davitti, Proportionality and Human Rights Protection in International Investment Arbitration: What’s Left Hanging in the Balance?
-
Miriam Bak McKenna, The Discourse of Proportionality and the Use of Force: International Law and the Power of Definition
-
Daniëlla Dam-de Jong, Who Is Targeted by the Council’s Sanctions? The UN Security Council and the Principle of Proportionality
-
Alexandra Hofer, The Proportionality of Unilateral “Targeted” Sanctions: Whose Interests Should Count?
-
Ulf Linderfalk, Proportionality and International Legal Pragmatics
-
Benedikt Pirker, Balancing Interpretative Arguments in International Law – A Linguistic Appraisal
-
Valentin Jeutner, Rebutting Four Arguments in Favour of Resolving ius cogens Norm Conflicts by Means of Proportionality Tests
-
Eric De Brabandere & Paula Baldini Miranda da Cruz, The Role of Proportionality in International Investment Law and Arbitration: A System-Specific Perspective
The latest issue of the Nordic Journal of International Law (Vol. 89, nos. 3-4, 2020) is out. Contents include:
