Emmanuel Gaillard (Shearman & Sterling) &
Yas Banifatemi (Shearman & Sterling) have published
Jurisdiction in Investment Treaty Arbitration (Juris Publishing 2018). Contents include:
- Emmanuel Gaillard, Introduction
-
Boaz Moselle, Economics and the Meaning of ‘Investment’
-
Stanimir Alexandrov, Is There a Legal Definition of ‘Investment’?
-
Pierre-Marie Dupuy, About the Definition of an International
Investment – The Requirement of a
Contribution to the Economic
Development of the Host State
-
Stephen M. Schwebel, Does the Consent of the Contracting Parties
Govern the Requirement of an ‘Investment’ as
Specified in Article 25 of the
ICSID Convention?
-
Michael Pokinghorne & Sven-Michael Volkmer, The Legality Requirement in Investment
Arbitration
-
Margaret Clare Ryan, Is There a “Nationality” of Investment?
Origin of Funds and Territorial Link to
the Host State
-
Megan Clifford & Christophe Douaire de Bondy, Determining State Intention when Negotiating and
Entering into Investment Treaties – A Canadian
Perspective /li>
-
Roberto Echandi-Gurdián, Determining State Intention when Negotiating and
Entering into Investment Treaties – A Developing
Country Perspective
-
Jae-Hoon Kim, Determining State Intention when Negotiating
and Entering into Investment Treaties –
A South Korean Perspective
-
Doak Bishop & Margrete Stevens, Jurisdiction Ratione Personae –
Is There a Standard Definition of an ‘Investor’
in Investment Treaties?
-
Yas Banifatemi, Taking Into Account Control Under
Denial of Benefits Clauses
-
Geneviève Bastid-Burdeau, Defining the Respondent State in
Investment Treaty Arbitration: Are There
Specific Standards of Jurisdiction?
- Veijo Heiskanen,
Entretemps: Is There a Distinction Between
Jurisdiction Ratione Temporis and Substantive
Protection Ratione Temporis?
-
Zachary Douglas, When Does an Investment Treaty Claim
Arise? An Excursus on the Anatomy of
the Cause of Action
