Matthew Saul (Universitetet i Oslo - PluriCourts),
Andreas Føllesdal (Universitetet i Oslo - Law), &
Geir Ulfstein (Universitetet i Oslo - Law) have published
The International Human Rights Judiciary and National Parliaments: Europe and Beyond (Cambridge Univ. Press 2017). Contents include:
- Matthew Saul, Andreas Føllesdal & Geir Ulfstein, Introduction
-
Geir Ulfstein, A transnational separation of powers?
-
Kirsten Roberts Lyer & Philippa Webb, Effective parliamentary oversight of human rights
-
Jürg Steiner, Citizens' deliberation and human rights
-
Alice Donald, Parliaments as compliance partners in the European convention on human rights system
-
Theresa Squatrito, Parliamentary interpretation and application of European human rights law
-
Matthew Saul, How and when can the international human rights judiciary promote the human rights role of national parliaments?
-
Amrei Müller, Obligations to 'secure' the rights of the Convention in an 'effective political democracy': how should parliaments and domestic courts interact?
-
Colin Murray, Shifting emergencies from the political to the legal sphere: placing the United Kingdom's derogations from the ECHR in historical context
-
Nino Tsereteli, The role of the European Court of Human Rights in facilitating legislative change in cases of long-term delays in implementation
-
Leiv Marsteintredet, The Inter-American Court of Human Rights and the mobilisation of parliaments
-
Ed Bates, Democratic override (or rejection) and the authority of the Strasbourg court – the UK parliament and prisoner voting
-
Colm O'Cinneide, Saying 'no' to Strasbourg – when are national parliaments justified in refusing to give effect to judgments of international human rights courts?
-
Andreas Føllesdal, Law making by law breaking? A theory of parliamentary civil disobedience against international human rights courts
-
Matthew Saul, Conclusion: how does, could, and should the international human rights judiciary interact with national parliaments?
