Malgosia Fitzmaurice (Queen Mary, Univ. of London - Law) &
Dai Tamada (Kobe Univ. - Law) have published
Whaling in the Antarctic: Significance and Implications of the ICJ Judgment (Brill | Nijhoff 2016). Contents include:
-
Malgosia Fitzmaurice & Dai Tamada, Introduction
-
Caroline E. Foster, Methodologies and Motivations: Was Japan’s Whaling Programme for Purposes of Scientific Research?
-
Shotaro Hamamoto, From the Requirement of Reasonableness to a ‘Comply and Explain’ Rule: The Standard of Review in the Whaling Judgment
-
Malgosia Fitzmaurice, The Whaling Convention and Thorny Issues of Interpretation
-
Theodore Christakis, The ‘Margin of Appreciation’ in the Use of Exemptions in International Law: Comparing the ICJ Whaling Judgment and the Case Law of the ECtHR
-
Dai Tamada, Unfavourable but Unavoidable Procedures: Procedural Aspects of the Whaling Case
-
Christian J. Tams, Roads Not Taken, Opportunities Missed: Procedural and Jurisdictional Questions Sidestepped in the Whaling Judgment
-
Mika Hayashi, The Whaling Judgment and the Challenges of Dynamic Treaty Regimes
-
Joji Morishita, IWC and the ICJ Judgment
-
Donald R. Rothwell, The Whaling Case: An Australian Perspective
-
Hironobu Sakai, After the Whaling in the Antarctic Judgment: Its Lessons and Prospects from a Japanese Perspective
-
Anthony Press, Science in the Court! The Role of Science in ‘Whaling in the Antarctic’
-
Akiho Shibata, Conclusion: The Judgment, Its Implications and Prospects
