Hafner-Burton, LeVeck, & Victor: How Activists Perceive the Utility of International Law

Emilie Marie Hafner-Burton (Univ. of California, San Diego - Global Policy and Strategy), Brad L. LeVeck (Univ. of California, Merced - Political Science), & David G. Victor (Univ. of California, San Diego - Global Policy and Strategy) have posted How Activists Perceive the Utility of International Law (Journal of Politics, forthcoming). Here's the abstract:

Scholars agree that international law works in part by empowering activists and have elaborated activist-focused theories particularly in the domains of environment and human rights. Some theories emphasize accountability — that law helps activists coerce, punish and deter offenders. Others emphasize that law helps to foster dialogue that leads to the acceptance of norms, trust and capacity to foster compliance. Possibly, law does both. We assess these views with a pair of survey experiments applied to 243 highly experienced NGO professionals who have first hand experience in either environment or human rights. Activists believe that NGOs would be less effective at reducing emissions of greenhouse gases or violations of core human rights in the absence of international law. They see the chief value of law arising through accountability politics rather than by fostering dialogue or capacity. However, the two communities have different views about whether binding or nonbinding agreements work best in their domain.