The main objective of this article is to put forward a critical analysis of the emergent international criminal justice system, epitomized by the creation of the permanent International Criminal Court (ICC). Such an endeavour is warranted on the assertion that international criminal justice scholarship has entered into a ‘reflective’ phase, the hallmark of which lies in the re-evaluation of the institutions of international criminal law in the light of the distinctive traits of international criminality derived from the combination of the criminological theory of state crime and the rising theory of international crime in the domain of international criminal law. In this context, the article summarizes the basic points and the epistemological premises of the criminological theory of state crime, while seeks to delimit the subject matter by alluding to the concept of core international crimes arising from the normative system of the ICC. The core aim of such a combined approach is not to downplay the existing differences between the criminological concept of state crime and the penal concept of core international crimes, but to highlight common points in order to draw tentative conclusions and make some preliminary suggestions from a criminal policy perspective.
Wednesday, July 9, 2014
Chouliaras: Bridging the Gap between Criminological Theory and Penal Theory within the International Criminal Justice System
Athanasios Chouliaras (Panteion Univ. of Political and Social Sciences) has posted Bridging the Gap between Criminological Theory and Penal Theory within the International Criminal Justice System
(European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, Vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 249–79, 2014). Here's the abstract: