The latest issue of the
European Journal of International Relations (Vol. 19, no. 3, September 2013) is out. Contents include:
- Special Issue: The End of International Relations Theory?
- Tim Dunne, Lene Hansen, & Colin Wight,
The end of International Relations theory?
-
John J. Mearsheimer & Stephen M. Walt,
Leaving theory behind: Why simplistic hypothesis testing is bad for International Relations
-
Andrew Bennett,
The mother of all isms: Causal mechanisms and structured pluralism in International Relations theory
-
Chris Brown,
The poverty of Grand Theory
-
Charlotte Epstein,
Constructivism or the eternal return of universals in International Relations. Why returning to language is vital to prolonging the owl’s flight
-
Stefano Guzzini,
The ends of International Relations theory: Stages of reflexivity and modes of theorizing
-
Patrick Thaddeus Jackson & Daniel H. Nexon,
International theory in a post-paradigmatic era: From substantive wagers to scientific ontologies
-
David A. Lake,
Theory is dead, long live theory: The end of the Great Debates and the rise of eclecticism in International Relations
-
Christian Reus-Smit,
Beyond metatheory?
-
Christine Sylvester,
Experiencing the end and afterlives of International Relations/theory
-
Arlene B. Tickner,
Core, periphery and (neo)imperialist International Relations
-
Michael C. Williams,
In the beginning: The International Relations enlightenment and the ends of International Relations theory
The latest issue of the European Journal of International Relations (Vol. 19, no. 3, September 2013) is out. Contents include:
