The purpose of this brief study is to gauge what the Permanent Court of International Justice might have had to say about the nebulous concept of the ‘international community’, as the Court administering the law of that community, but also developing it, thereby contributing to the stabilization and further integration of that community. This is done by ‘reverse-engineering’ the jurisprudence of the PCIJ, seeking to canvass how the Court understood the concept of the 'international community' and how it would have wanted it to evolve. The study surveys the Court’s case law for what are commonly accepted as the ‘hallmarks’ of an (international) community, or at least those commonly associated with the idea: the make-up of the community; the concept of obligations and action in the ‘general’ interest; and the existence of institutions providing protection of the community interest.
Tuesday, April 24, 2012
Tzanakopoulos: The Permanent Court of International Justice and the 'International Community'
Antonios Tzanakopoulos (Univ. College London - Law) has posted The Permanent Court of International Justice and the 'International Community' (in The Legacy of the Permanent Court of International Justice, Malgosia Fitzmaurice & Christian Tams eds., forthcoming). Here's the abstract: