New Volume: Italian Yearbook of International Law

The latest volume of the Italian Yearbook of International Law (Vol. 20, 2010) is out. Contents include:

• Symposium: The Future of the ECHR System
• Giuseppe Cataldi, Presentation of the Symposium
• The ECHR System and International Law
• Raffaella Nigro, The Notion of “Jurisdiction” in Article 1: Future Scenarios for the Extra-Territorial Application of the European Convention on Human Rights
• Ottavio Quirico, Substantive and Procedural Issues Raised by the Accession of the EU to the ECHR
• Beatrice I. Bonafè, The ECHR and the Immunities Provided by International Law
• Comments
• Pasquale De Sena, The Notion of “Contracting Parties’ Jurisdiction” Under Article 1 of the ECHR: Some Marginal Remarks on Nigro’s Paper
• Benedetto Conforti, Comments on the Accession of the European Union to the ECHR
• Emilio De Capitani, EU Accession to the ECHR: A Parliamentary Perspective
• Marco Gestri, Access to a Court and Jurisdictional Immunities of States: What Scope for the Balancing of Interests Test?
• General Aspects of the Functioning of the ECHR System
• Antonio Bultrini, The European Convention on Human Rights and the Rule of Prior Exhaustion of Domestic Remedies in International Law
• Simona Granata, Manifest Ill-Foundedness and Absence of a Significant Disadvantage as Inadmissibility Criteria of Inadmissibility for the Individual Application to the Court
• Andrea Caligiuri & Nicola Napoletano, The Application of the ECHR in the Domestic Systems
• Comments
• Guido Raimondi, Reflections on the Rule of Prior Exhaustion of Domestic Remedies in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights
• Françoise Tulkens, The Link Between Manifest Ill-Foundedness and Absence of a Significant Disadvantage as Inadmissibility Criteria for Individual Applications
• Pasquale Pirrone, The Value of the Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights for the Courts of the Respondent State: Domestic Judicial Decision in Favour of the Applicant and the Principle of “Doing as Much as Possible”
• General Conclusion on the Symposium
• Jean-Paul Costa, Concluding Remarks on the Future of the Strasbourg Court