Symposium: The New Face of Armed Conflict: Enemy Combatants After Hamdan v. Rumsfeld

The latest issue of the George Washington Law Review (Vol. 75, nos. 5-6, August 2007) contains a symposium on The New Face of Armed Conflict: Enemy Combatants After Hamdan v. Rumsfeld. It can be downloaded here. Contents include:

• Symposium: The New Face of Armed Conflict: Enemy Combatants After Hamdan v. Rumsfeld
• Gregory E. Maggs, Foreword
• John B. Bellinger, III, Transcript of Remarks
• Stephen A. Saltzburg, A Different War: Ten Key Questions About the War on Terror
• Ingrid Detter, The Law of War and Illegal Combatants
• Sean D. Murphy, Evolving Geneva Convention Paradigms in the "War on Terrorism": Applying the Core Rules to the Release of Persons Deemed "Unprivileged Combatants"
• Mark A. Drumbl, The Expressive Value of Prosecuting and Punishing Terrorists: Hamdan, the Geneva Conventions, and International Criminal Law
• Leila Nadya Sadat, Extraordinary Rendition, Torture, and Other Nightmares from the War on Terror
• Robert M. Chesney, State Secrets and the Limits of National Security Litigation
• Margaret L. Satterthwaite, Rendered Meaningless: Extraordinary Rendition and the Rule of Law
• Michael German, Trying Enemy Combatants in Civilian Courts