The latest issue of the
Human Rights Law Review (Vol. 21, no. 1, March 2021) is out. Contents include:
- Kathryn McNeilly, The Temporal Ontology of the Human Rights Council’s Universal Periodic Review
-
Luka Glušac, A Critical Appraisal of the Venice Principles on the Protection and Promotion of the Ombudsman: An Equivalent to the Paris Principles?
-
Bríd Ní Ghráinne, Complementary Protection and Encampment
-
Dimitri Van Den Meerssche, A Legal Black Hole in the Cosmos of Virtue—The Politics of Human Rights Critique Against the World Bank
-
Antonio Moreira Maués, Breno Baía Magalhães, Paulo André Nassar, & Rafaela Sena, Judicial Dialogue Between National Courts and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights: A Comparative Study of Argentina, Brazil, Colombia and Mexico
-
Marie-Catherine Petersmann, Contested Indigeneity and Traditionality in Environmental Litigation: The Politics of Expertise in Regional Human Rights Courts
-
Charles O’Sullivan & Donna McNamara, The ‘Necessity' of Austerity and its Relationship with the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: A Case Study of Ireland and the United Kingdom
-
Paweł Łącki, Consensus as a Basis for Dynamic Interpretation of the ECHR—A Critical Assessment
-
Giulia Ciliberto, A Brand-New Exclusionary Clause to the Prohibition of Collective Expulsion of Aliens: The Applicant’s Own Conduct in N.D. and N.T. v Spain
-
Lewis Graham, Jeanty v Belgium: Saving Lives Provides (another) Exception to Article 3 ECHR
-
Stewart Manley, Critical Speech in Southeast Asian Grey Literature During the COVID-19 Pandemic
The latest issue of the Human Rights Law Review (Vol. 21, no. 1, March 2021) is out. Contents include:
