Friday, August 31, 2018

New Issue: Journal of International Dispute Settlement

The latest issue of the Journal of International Dispute Settlement (Vol. 9, no. 3, September 2018) is out. Contents include:
  • Special Issue: Experts in the International Adjudicative Process
    • Laurence Boisson de Chazournes, Hélène Ruiz Fabri, Makane Moïse Mbengue, Rukmini Das, & Guillaume Gros, The Expert in the International Adjudicative Process: Introduction to the Special Issue
    • Mohamed Bennouna, Experts before the International Court of Justice: What for?
    • James Flett, When is an Expert not an Expert?
    • Geoffrey Senogles, Some Views from the Crucible: The Perspective of an Expert Witness on the Adversarial Principle
    • Cherise Valles, Different Forms of Expert Involvement in WTO Dispute Settlement Proceedings
    • Joan E Donoghue, Expert Scientific Evidence in a Broader Context
    • Kate Cook, Judging ‘Best Available Science’: Emerging Issues and the Role of Experts
    • Isabelle Van Damme, The Assessment of Expert Evidence in International Adjudication
    • José E Alvarez, The Search for Objectivity: The Use of Experts in Philip Morris v Uruguay
    • Marisa Goldstein, Legal Basis and Procedures for Consulting with Experts and International Organizations in WTO Dispute Settlement
    • Philippe Gautier, Experts before ITLOS: An Overview of the Tribunal’s Practice
    • Kate Parlett, Parties’ Engagement with Experts in International Litigation
    • Mélida Hodgson & Melissa Stewart, Experts in Investor-State Arbitration: The Tribunal as Gatekeeper
    • Brendan Plant, Expert Evidence and the Challenge of Procedural Reform in International Dispute Settlement
    • Jean-Marc Sorel, Symposium—The Expert in the International Adjudicative Process: Concluding Observations
    • Laurence Boisson de Chazournes, Makane Moise Mbengue, Rukmini Das, & Guillaume Gros, One Size does not Fit All—Uses of Experts before International Courts and Tribunals: An Insight into the Practice
  • Current Developments
    • Patrick Dumberry, Requiem for Crimea: Why Tribunals Should Have Declined Jurisdiction over the Claims of Ukrainian Investors against Russian under the Ukraine–Russia BIT