Foreign investment is perceived as one of the most significant factors for development and it is no accident that a key criterion for determining that an activity qualifies as an investment under the ICSID Convention is whether it contributes to the economic or other development of the host state. Investment tribunals have in recent years examined both the ambit of regulatory powers of the host state in taking measures in response to an existing debt crisis, and the impact of a negotiated sovereign debt restructuring on the rights of non-cooperative creditors. In both respects, investment tribunals have not conclusively, or unanimously, linked socio-economic rights with investment protection. This chapter examines the sovereign debt-related awards of investment tribunals and suggests how the systemic integration of investment law and human rights might prevent investment arbitration from distorting economically and socially beneficial sovereign debt restructurings and other regulatory measures in the context of sovereign debt crises.
Sunday, January 28, 2018
Goldmann: Foreign Investment, Sovereign Debt, and Human Rights
Matthias Goldmann (Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main - Law) has posted Foreign Investment, Sovereign Debt, and Human Rights (in Sovereign Debt and Human Rights, Ilias Bantekas & Cephas Lumina eds., forthcoming). Here's the abstract:Here's the abstract: