The latest issue of
Arbitration International (Vol. 32, no. 1, March 2016) is out. Contents include:
- Articles
- Stephen M. Schwebel,
The outlook for the continued vitality, or lack thereof, of investor–State arbitration
-
Francisco González de Cossío,
Enforcement of annulled awards: towards a better analytical approach
-
Berk Demirkol,
Interpretation of the dispute settlement clause in Turkish investment treaties with Turkic States
-
Kateryna Bondar,
Allocation of costs in investor-State and commercial arbitration: towards a harmonized approach
-
Stephanie Mullen & Elizabeth Whitsitt,
Quantum, annulment and the requirement to give reasons: analysis and reform
-
Mitchell Moranis,
Between power and procedure: the changing balance of investment treaty protections
- Case Notes
- Guido Carducci,
Notes on the EUCJ’s ruling in Gazprom: West Tankers is unaffected and anti-suit injunctions issued by arbitral tribunals are not governed by EU Regulation 44/2001
- Jennifer Cabrera, Dante Figueroa, & Herfried Wöss,
The administrative contract, non-arbitrability, and the recognition and execution of awards annulled in the country of origin: the case of Commisa v Pemex
- Tamar Meshel,
Bannai v Erez and the jurisdictional race of the Israeli and English courts
- Friedrich Rosenfeld,
Security for costs in ICSID arbitration: RSM Production Corporation v St Lucia
-
Klaus Peter Berger & Thomas Arntz,
Good faith as a ‘general organising principle’ of the common law
- Recent Developments
-
Arthad Kurlekar & Gauri Pillai, To be or not to be: the oscillating support of Indian courts to arbitration awards challenged under the public policy exception
- Eleni Magklasi, ‘Shaky’ times for arbitration clauses: rethinking business common sense
