Helmut Philipp Aust (Humboldt Univ. Berlin - Law) &
Georg Nolte (Humboldt Univ. Berlin - Law; Member, International Law Commission) have published
The Interpretation of International Law by Domestic Courts: Uniformity, Diversity, Convergence (Oxford Univ. Press 2016). Contents include:
-
Georg Nolte, Introduction
- Michael Waibel, Principles of Treaty Interpretation - Developed for and Applied by National Courts
- André Nollkaemper, Grounds for the Application of International Rules of Interpretation in National Courts
- Eirik Bjorge, 'Contractual' and 'Statutory' Treaty Interpretation in Domestic Courts? Convergence around the Vienna Rules
- Antonios Tzanakopoulos, Judicial Dialogue as A Means of Interpretation
- Mathias Forteau, The Role of the International Rules of Interpretation for the Determination of Direct Effect of International Agreements
- Peter Staubach, The Interpretation of Unwritten International Law by Domestic Judges
- Dire Tladi, Interpretation of Treaties in an International Law-Friendly Framework: the Case of South Africa
- Alejandro Rodiles, The Law and Politics of the Pro Persona Principle in Latin America
- Christian Djeffal, Dynamic and Evolutive Interpretation of the ECHR by Domestic Courts? An Inquiry into the Judicial Architecture of Europe
- Julian Arato, Deference to the Executive: The US Debate in Global Perspective
- Yukiko Takashiba, Gingerly Walking on the VCLT Frontier? Reflections from a Survey on the Interpretive Approach of the Japanese Courts to Treaties
- Vik Kanwar, Treaty Interpretation in Indian Courts - Adherence, Coherence, and Convergence
- Theresa Reinold, Diffusion Theories and the Interpretive Approaches of Domestic Courts
- Achilles Skordas, Treaty Interpretation and Global Governance: The Role of Domestic Courts
- Olga Frishman & Eyal Benvenisti, National Courts and Interpretive Approaches to International Law: The Case Against Convergence
- Helmut Philipp Aust, Between Universal Aspiration and Local Application: Concluding Observations
