The latest issue of the
Journal of International Dispute Settlement (Vol. 2, no. 2, August 2011) is out. Contents include:
- Thomas Schultz, Arbitration as an iPhone, or Why Conduct Academic Research in Arbitration?
- William W. Park, Arbitration in Autumn
- George A. Bermann, ‘Domesticating’ the New York Convention: the Impact of the Federal Arbitration Act
- François Ost, The Twelfth Camel, or the Economics of Justice
- Stephan W. Schill, Allocating Adjudicatory Authority: Most-Favoured-Nation Clauses as a Basis of Jurisdiction—A Reply to Zachary Douglas
- Alexander Orakhelashvili, The Competence of the International Court of Justice and the Doctrine of the Indispensable Party: from Monetary Gold to East Timor and Beyond
- Katherine Del Mar, Weight of Evidence Generated through Intra-Institutional Fact-finding before the International Court of Justice
- Ralf Michaels, A Fuller Concept of Law Beyond the State? Thoughts on Lon Fuller’s Contributions to the Jurisprudence of Transnational Dispute Resolution—A Reply to Thomas Schultz
- Peer Zumbansen, Debating Autonomy and Procedural Justice: The Lex Mercatoria in the Context of Global Governance Debates—A Reply to Thomas Schultz
- David Holloway, Avoiding Duplicative Litigation about Arbitration Awards within the EU
- Sophie Nappert & Dieter Flader, A Psychological Perspective on the Facilitation of Settlement in International Arbitration—Examining the CEDR Rules
- David Schneiderman, Legitimacy and Reflexivity in International Investment Arbitration: A New Self-Restraint?
The latest issue of the Journal of International Dispute Settlement (Vol. 2, no. 2, August 2011) is out. Contents include:
