Cesare P.R. Romano (Loyola Law School Los Angeles) has published
The Sword and the Scales: The United States and International Courts and Tribunals (Cambridge Univ. Press 2009). Contents include:
- John B. Bellinger, III, International courts and tribunals and the rule of law
- Steven Kull & Clay Ramsay, American public opinion on international courts and tribunals
- Mary Ellen O'Connell, Arbitration and avoidance of war: the nineteenth century American vision
- Sean D. Murphy, The United States and the International Court of Justice: coping with antinomies
- Melissa A. Waters, The U.S. Supreme Court and the International Court of Justice: what does 'respectful consideration' mean?
- John P. Cerone, U.S. attitudes toward international criminal courts and tribunals
- Elizabeth A.H. Abi-Mershed, The United States and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights
- Tara J. Melish, From paradox to subsidiarity: the United States and human rights treaty bodies
- John R. Crook, The U.S. and international claims and compensation bodies
- Jeffrey L. Dunoff, Does the U.S. support international tribunals? The case of the multilateral trade system
- David A. Gantz, The United States and dispute settlement under the North American Free Trade Agreement: ambivalence, frustration and occasional defiance
- Susan L. Karamanian, Dispute settlement under NAFTA Chapter 11: a response to the critics in the United States
- Cesare P.R. Romano, The United States and international courts: getting the cost-benefit analysis right
Cesare P.R. Romano (Loyola Law School Los Angeles) has published The Sword and the Scales: The United States and International Courts and Tribunals (Cambridge Univ. Press 2009). Contents include:
