The Award in International Investment Arbitration is a comprehensive study of the international investment award, which serves as a unique reference work and an authoritative one-stop resource on the topic for both practitioners and academics. The book reviews the award in a holistic manner: from award drafting to the procedural principles that govern it; from arbitral deliberations and tribunal dynamics to post-award challenges; from the role of gender in decision-making to the impact of tribunal secretaries. It puts emphasis on the practitioners needs with a careful selection of hands-on topics, such as fact-finding in complex disputes, the role of experts, and legal reasoning and persuasion. Sensitive to contemporary challenges, the book addresses both existing questions that have evolved over time and novel topics that have not yet received sufficient attention, such as the impact of technology on award drafting.
By bringing together the biggest names in the contemporary investment arbitration scene - a unique line-up of highly-qualified arbitrators and experts from academia and international legal practice - The Award in International Investment Arbitration offers a singular reservoir of knowledge and experience on the topic, drawn from a diverse set of angles and perspectives.
Saturday, October 19, 2024
Fach Gómez & Titi: The Award in International Investment Arbitration
New Issue: Global Responsibility to Protect
- Adrian Gallagher, Charles T. Hunt, & Cecilia Jacob, The Responsibility to Protect at an Inflection Point
- Gareth Evans, Atrocity Prevention and Response: Challenges for R2P
- Special Section: Cyberspace and the Responsibility to Protect
- Rhiannon Neilsen, Cyberspace and the Responsibility to Protect Populations from Atrocity Crimes
- Federica D’Alessandra & Ross James Gildea, Technology, R2P, and the UN Framework of Analysis for Atrocity Crimes
- Talita Dias, Finding Common Ground: the Right to Be Free from Incitement to Discrimination, Hostility, and Violence in the Digital Age
- Savita Pawnday, Digital Technologies and Atrocity Risks
Friday, October 18, 2024
Moremen: Perceptions of State: The US State Department and International Law
Why, and to what extent, are states more or less likely to comply with international law? No overarching state compels compliance, and the international institutional context is thin, yet states seem largely to comply. How do we explain this behaviour? Developed through interviews with eighty State Department senior officials from across five recent administrations, Philip Moremen provides a qualitatively and quantitatively rich study of the extent to which and under what conditions the United States and other countries comply with international law. US policymakers consider legal issues, national interest, and other factors together when making decisions-law is not always dispositive. Nevertheless, international law constrains states. In State Department policymaking there is a strong culture of respect for international law, and lawyers play a highly influential role. In this context, the book concludes by investigating the effect of the Trump Administration on the culture and processes of the State Department.
Conversation on "Feminist Theory and International Law: Posthuman Perspectives"
Lecture: Dill on “International Law in Gaza: Belligerent Intent & Provisional Measures”
Kulamadayil: Global Starvation Governance and International Law
Lys Kulamadayil reflects on the concept of starvation in international law, and argues that contemporary understandings have been distorted by the classification of “famine” in purely technical terms, obscuring the intentional use of starvation as a tactic of war, erasure and genocide.
New Issue: International & Comparative Law Quarterly
- Articles
- Richard L. Kilpatrick, Jr, Revisiting the Five-Powers War Risk Exclusion
- Kathryn Greenman, Of War and International Investment Law
- Harry Hobbs & Donald Rothwell, Towards a Legal Era of Islands: The International and Constitutional Legal Status of Island Territories
- Douglas Guilfoyle & Joanna Mossop, The Extent and Legitimacy of the Judicial Function in UNCLOS Dispute Settlement
- Delia Ferri, Iryna Tekuchova, & Eva Krolla, Between Disability and Culture: The Search for a Legal Taxonomy of Sign Languages in the European Union
- Kanstantsin Dzehtsiarou & Niccolò Ridi, The Use of Scholarship by the European Court of Human Rights
- Shorter Articles
- Mauro Arturo Rivera León, Voting Protocols as Informal Judicial Institutions: The Politics of Enforceability and Strategic Breaching
- Christian Henderson, US and UK Military Strikes in Yemen and the Jus Ad Bellum
- Yingfeng Shao, Laura Carballo Piñeiro, Maximo Q Mejia, Jr, A Newcomer to Maritime Law: The Beijing Convention on the International Effects of Judicial Sales of Ships
New Issue: Nordic Journal of Human Rights
- Yulia Dergacheva, A Critical Engagement with the Conceptualization of Sexual Harassment in International Human Rights Law
- Klaus D. Beiter, Open Access ‘Unaccomplished’ – Reforming Copyright or Reconceptualizing Science? Access to Scholarly Publications under a (Reinterpreted) Right to Science
- Tomas Wedin & Carl Wilén, Historicizing the Historical Turn in Human Rights Studies: Origins, Inequality, and Neoliberalism in the Modern Epoch
- Elin Skaar & Aaron John Spitzer, Conceptualizing the Legitimacy of Non-Transitional Truth Commissions: Norway and Canada Compared
- Muyiwa Adigun, Companies’ Human Rights: The Implications for a Human Rights Approach to Climate Change Litigation in South Africa
- Kateryna Zakomorna, Oleksandr Poproshaiev, Olena Poproshaieva, Viktor Muntian & Anna Prikhodko, Legal Guarantees of Physical Activity as Determinants of the Human Right to Health: The Ukrainian Experience in the European Integration Context
- Puskar R. Joshi, Zohreh R. Eslami & Hector H. Rivera, New Constitution in Nepal: Fundamental Freedoms and Educational Rights Provisions, and Implications for Dalits’ Schooling
Call for Papers: 2025 ILA-ASIL Asia-Pacific Research Forum
Thursday, October 17, 2024
New Issue: American Journal of International Law
- Articles
- Ingrid Brunk & Monica Hakimi, The Prohibition of Annexations and the Foundations of Modern International Law
- Joanna Jarose, A Sleeping Giant? The ENMOD Convention as a Limit on Intentional Environmental Harm in Armed Conflict and Beyond
- International Decisions
- Ibrahim A. Alturki, R (on the Application of PACCAR Inc. and Others) v. Competition Appeal Tribunal and Others, [2023] UKSC 28
- Lauri Mälksoo, Application of the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism and of International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Ukraine v. Russian Federation), Judgment
- Tomasz Jaroszyński, European Parliament v. European Commission, Case C-137/21, Judgment
- Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law
- The Department of State Announces Initiatives to Counter Foreign State Information Manipulation
- The United States Designates the Overthrow of Niger's Government a “Coup d'Etat”
- New Compact of Free Association Agreements with Micronesia, the Marshall Islands, and Palau Approved by Congress
- President Biden Issues Memorandum Requiring Assurances from Recipients of U.S. Military Aid and the State and Defense Departments Certify Israel's Compliance
- The UN General Assembly Adopts U.S.-Led Resolution on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence
- The United States Comments on Matters Pending at the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court Pertaining to the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
- Recent Books on International Law
- J. Benton Heath, Neutrality and Governance in a Weaponized World
- Natsu Taylor Saito, reviewing Race and National Security, edited by Matiangai V. S. Sirleaf
- Kal Raustiala, reviewing Digital Empires: The Global Battle to Regulate Technology, by Anu Bradford
- Annyssa Bellal, reviewing Rebel Courts: The Administration of Justice by Armed Insurgents, by René Provost
Conference: Forty-Second Investment Treaty Forum Public Conference
New Issue: International Theory
- Scott Wolford & Toby J. Rider, Weak sovereignty and interstate war
- Patrick J. McDonald & Kevin Galambos, Trilateral politics in hierarchy, war, and state formation
- Kate Yoon, The many faces of sovereignty
- David Lefkowitz, A new philosophy for international legal skepticism?
- Tim Beaumont, John Stuart Mill on the Suez Canal and the limits of self-defence
Von Bernstorff: L’essor et la chute du droit international humanitaire
Les règles de protection des civils ont toujours été au cœur du droit de la guerre (ius in bello). La codification de ces règles a commencé dans la seconde moitié du 19e siècle, à l'apogée de l'impérialisme européen, et s'est poursuivie après les deux guerres mondiales et pendant la guerre froide. Malgré cela, le nombre de civils tués à la guerre n'a cessé d'augmenter jusqu'à aujourd'hui.
L'expert en droit international Jochen VON BERNSTORFF décrit l'essor et la chute des règles de protection des civils en temps de guerre.
Wednesday, October 16, 2024
Seminar Series: Thinking Gender, History and International Law
New Issue: International Legal Materials
- Views adopted under art. 31 of the Convention, concerning Commc'n No. 4/2021 (U.N. Comm. Enforced Disappearances), with introductory note by Ariel Dulitzky
- Convention on Int'l Cooperation in the Investigation and Prosecution of the Crime of Genocide, Crimes against Humanity and War Crimes, with introductory note by Hilly Moodrick-Even Khen
- Case C-632/20 P, Spain v. Eur. Comm'n (C.J.E.U.), with introductory note by Eva Kassoti
- Foreign Relations Law of the People's Republic of China, with introductory note by Zheng Tang
- R (AAA (Syria) and Others) v. Secretary of State for the Home Dep't (UKSC), with introductory note by Guy S. Goodwin-Gill
Tuesday, October 15, 2024
Call for Papers: 20th Annual Conference of the European Society of International Law
Monday, October 14, 2024
Carballo Piñeiro & Mejia: The Elgar Companion to the Law and Practice of the International Maritime Organization
This Companion sheds light on the law and practice of the International Maritime Organization (IMO), which plays a key role in securing safe, secure, and efficient shipping on clean oceans.
Considering core elements of IMO history, this insightful Companion delineates how the Organization has revitalized its law-making powers, encompassing an increasing number and range of maritime-related activities. Taking into account the perspectives of flag, port, seafaring, and ship-owning states, the chapters focus on areas of increasing concern such as compliance and enforcement, and ocean governance. Expert contributors critically examine the efforts made and limitations encountered by the IMO in contributing towards achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, exploring the potential for building a sustainable and inclusive maritime governance. Ultimately, this Companion showcases how the IMO evolved from an ostensibly consultative inter-governmental forum into an active global standards-setting organization.
Sunday, October 13, 2024
Bradley: Historical Gloss and Foreign Affairs: Constitutional Authority in Practice
In the more than 230 years since the Constitution took effect, the constitutional law governing the conduct of foreign affairs has evolved significantly. But that evolution did not come through formal amendments or Supreme Court rulings. Rather, the law has been defined by the practices of Congress and the executive branch, also known as “historical gloss.”
Curtis A. Bradley documents this process in action. He shows that expansions in presidential power over foreign affairs have often been justified by reference to historical gloss, but that Congress has not merely stepped aside. Belying conventional accounts of the “imperial presidency” in foreign affairs, Congress has also benefited from gloss, claiming powers for itself in the international arena not clearly addressed in the constitutional text and disrupting claims of exclusive presidential authority.
Historical Gloss and Foreign Affairs proposes a constitutional theory that can make sense of these legal changes. In contrast, originalist theories of constitutional interpretation often ignore influential post-Founding developments, while nonoriginalist theories tend to focus on judicial decisions rather than the actions and reasoning of Congress and the executive branch. Moreover, the constitutional theories that do focus on practice have typically emphasized changes at particular moments in time. What we see in the constitutional law of foreign affairs, however, is the long-term accumulation of nonjudicial precedents that is characteristic of historical gloss. With gloss confirmed as a prime mover in the development of foreign affairs law, we can begin to recognize its broader status as an important and longstanding form of constitutional reasoning.