- Symposium: The Future of International Criminal Justice
- M. Cherif Bassiouni, Challenges facing a rule-of-law-oriented world order
- Naomi Norberg, Terrorism and international criminal justice: dim prospects for a future together
- Jordan J. Paust, Terrorism’s proscription and core elements of an objective definition
- Kathleen Maloney-Dunn, Humanizing terrorism through international criminal law: equal justice for victims, fair treatment of suspects, and fundamental human rights at the ICC
- Luz E. Nagle, Should terrorism be subject to universal jurisdiction?
- Stephen I. Vladeck, Terrorism and international criminal law after the Military Commissions Acts
- Michael A. Newton, The complementarity conundrum: are we watching evolution or evisceration?
- Linda E. Carter, Principle of conplementarity and the International Criminal Court: the role of ne bis in idem
- Linda M. Keller, The practice of the International Criminal Court: comments on “the complementarity conundrum”
- Brad R. Roth, Coming to terms with ruthlessness, sovereign equality, global pluralism, and the limits of international criminal justice
- Jamie Mayerfeld, Ruthlessness, impunity, and the effacement of international human rights law
- André Nollkaemper, Systematic effects of international responsibility for international crimes
- Allen S. Weiner, Working the system: a comment on André Nollkaemper’s system criminality in international law
- Julian Ku, How system criminality could exacerbate the weaknesses of international criminal law
- Mark A. Drumbl, Accountability for system criminality
Wednesday, October 5, 2011
Symposium: The Future of International Criminal Justice
The current issue of the Santa Clara Journal of International Law (Vol. 8, no. 1, 2010) contains a symposium on "The Future of International Criminal Justice." Contents include:
